MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/08035250310021109

Медицинская библиотека · Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2004

Urinary and faecal incontinence: a population-based study.

Söderstrom U, Hoelcke M, Alenius L, Söderling A C, Hjern A

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: To investigate the coexistence of urine and faecal incontinence in Swedish schoolchildren.

METHODS

Cohort study of all schoolchildren in the first and fourth grades in the city of Eskilstuna. A questionnaire was used, in which parents reported the prevalence of urine and faecal incontinence for their children. with a response rate of 67%. Data were analysed with multiple logistic regression.

RESULTS

Daytime urinary incontinence (at least once a month) was reported in 6.3% of the first graders and 4.3% of the fourth graders, while bedwetting (at least once a month) was reported in 7.1% and 2.7% and faecal incontinence in 9.8% and 5.6%, respectively. Daytime urinary incontinence was strongly associated with faecal incontinence; adjusted odds ratio (OR) 7.2 (p < 0.001) as well as with bedwetting; OR 4.1 (p < 0.001), whereas faecal incontinence and bedwetting lacked a significant association (OR 1.2).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that soiling and daytime urinary incontinence often coexist in Swedish schoolchildren. Collaborative treatment strategies with gastroenterological and urological content need to be developed for these children.

Для цитирования: Söderstrom U, Hoelcke M, Alenius L, Söderling A C, Hjern A. Urinary and faecal incontinence: a population-based study.. Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992). 2004. DOI: 10.1080/08035250310021109.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.