The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2025
The Evolution of Research on Orbital Floor Fractures: A Bibliometric Analysis.
СтатьяОбзорПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Braud Savannah C, Boghosian Tanya, Jubouri Yousif F, ElAbd Rawan, Sheckley Marwan, Jabori Sinan K, Thaller Seth R
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Orbital floor fractures present complex functional and aesthetic challenges for surgeons. A review of the most influential literature in this area can help clinicians gain a deeper understanding of current research trends and inform evidence-based treatment strategies.
METHODS: The Clarivate Web of Science database was used to identify the 50 most-cited articles on orbital fractures. A bibliometric analysis was conducted to assess publication metrics, including authorship, year of publication, level of evidence classification, and country of origin, as well as to identify emerging research topics.
RESULTS: The top 50 most-cited articles, published between 1957 and 2017, accumulated a total of 5618 citations. "Clinical Recommendations for Repair of Isolated Orbital Floor Fractures-An Evidence-based Analysis" by Burnstine received the highest number of citations (n = 294), followed by "Nonsurgical Management of Blow-out Fractures of Orbital Floor" (n = 211) by Putterman and colleagues, and "Intervention Within Days for Some Orbital Floor Fractures: The White-eyed Blowout" (n = 200) by Jordan and colleagues. Ellis authored the highest number of studies (n = 3), and the United States led in publication output (n = 23).
CONCLUSION: Bibliometric analysis of influential research on orbital fractures helps clinicians navigate the extensive body of literature on the subject. Furthermore, understanding key research trends enables clinicians to refine their clinical practices and stay informed about evolving research trends.
METHODS: The Clarivate Web of Science database was used to identify the 50 most-cited articles on orbital fractures. A bibliometric analysis was conducted to assess publication metrics, including authorship, year of publication, level of evidence classification, and country of origin, as well as to identify emerging research topics.
RESULTS: The top 50 most-cited articles, published between 1957 and 2017, accumulated a total of 5618 citations. "Clinical Recommendations for Repair of Isolated Orbital Floor Fractures-An Evidence-based Analysis" by Burnstine received the highest number of citations (n = 294), followed by "Nonsurgical Management of Blow-out Fractures of Orbital Floor" (n = 211) by Putterman and colleagues, and "Intervention Within Days for Some Orbital Floor Fractures: The White-eyed Blowout" (n = 200) by Jordan and colleagues. Ellis authored the highest number of studies (n = 3), and the United States led in publication output (n = 23).
CONCLUSION: Bibliometric analysis of influential research on orbital fractures helps clinicians navigate the extensive body of literature on the subject. Furthermore, understanding key research trends enables clinicians to refine their clinical practices and stay informed about evolving research trends.