Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 1999
Interactive telecardiology for the evaluation of heart murmurs in children.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
McConnell M E, Steed R D, Tichenor J M, Hannon D W
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To study the accuracy, patient satisfaction, and cost of telecardiographic evaluations of pediatric patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients referred to a rural pediatric cardiology outreach clinic were examined in person by a pediatric cardiologist. A second pediatric cardiologist who had no knowledge of the findings of face-to-face examination reevaluated the same patients utilizing a 768-Kbps telemedicine system. Any additional testing was performed by personnel who had no knowledge of the face-to-face evaluation. The main outcome measures included the final cardiac diagnosis, frequency of additional tests such as electrocardiography, (ECG) echocardiography (ECHO), and patient satisfaction.
RESULTS: The diagnosis was agreed upon in 19 of the 21 patients studied. Two patients with small ventricular septal defects were missed during the telemedicine evaluation. The utilization rates of additional studies for both the face-to-face cardiologist and the telemedicine cardiologist were not significantly different. Patient satisfaction with the telemedicine encounter was good.
CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine appears to be effective and useful for the cardiac evaluation of pediatric patients. In spite of high data-transfer rates, differences between telemedicine and face-to-face patient encounters were observed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients referred to a rural pediatric cardiology outreach clinic were examined in person by a pediatric cardiologist. A second pediatric cardiologist who had no knowledge of the findings of face-to-face examination reevaluated the same patients utilizing a 768-Kbps telemedicine system. Any additional testing was performed by personnel who had no knowledge of the face-to-face evaluation. The main outcome measures included the final cardiac diagnosis, frequency of additional tests such as electrocardiography, (ECG) echocardiography (ECHO), and patient satisfaction.
RESULTS: The diagnosis was agreed upon in 19 of the 21 patients studied. Two patients with small ventricular septal defects were missed during the telemedicine evaluation. The utilization rates of additional studies for both the face-to-face cardiologist and the telemedicine cardiologist were not significantly different. Patient satisfaction with the telemedicine encounter was good.
CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine appears to be effective and useful for the cardiac evaluation of pediatric patients. In spite of high data-transfer rates, differences between telemedicine and face-to-face patient encounters were observed.