Future oncology (London, England) · 2024
Efficacy and safety of triple or dual therapies for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Network Meta-AnalysisСистематический обзорСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jiang Jingqi, Wang Yuhan, Bai Jiangtao, Yang Gaoyang, Wang Hanzhang, Ding Hui, Zhang Yunxin, Zhai Zhenxing, Dong Zhilong, Wang Zhiping
Аннотация
Aim: To compare triple and dual therapies for efficacy and safety in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Methods: A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to indirectly compare overall survival, progression-free survival and adverse events in mHSPC patients with triple and dual therapies. Results: Triple and dual therapies were related to considerably higher overall survival than androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), and darolutamide + docetaxel + ADT (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.39-0.76; P score = 0.89) emerged as the best option. In terms of progression-free survival, abiraterone + prednisolone + docetaxel + ADT (HR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.19-0.53; P score = 0.92) emerged as the best option. Apalutamide + ADT had the lowest odds of adverse events. Conclusion: Triple therapies were particularly effective in mHSPC patients, but the incidence of adverse events was significantly high.