An 11-year multicentric surgical experience on pediatric orbital floor trapdoor fracture: A World Oral Maxillofacial Trauma (WORMAT) project.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cena Paolo, Raco Immacolata, Roccia Fabio, Federica Sobrero, Dediol Emil, Kos Boris, Bottini Gian Battista, Goetzinger Maximilian, Samieirad Sahand, Gorla Luis Fernando de Oliveira, Pereira-Filho Valfrido Antonio, Pechalova Petia, Sapundzhiev Angel, Lazíc Marko, Konstantinovic Vitomir S, Zavattero Emanuele, Sivrić Anamaria, Kordić Mario, Rahman Sajjad Abdur, Rahman Tabishur, Sohal Karpal Singh, Aladelusi Timothy, Rae Euan, Laverick Sean, Vesnaver Aleš, Birk Anže, Politis Constantinus, Dubron Kathia
Аннотация
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 14 centres collected data for patients aged ≤16 years operated between January 2011 and December 2022. The demographic, cause and type of fracture, timing from injury to surgery, surgical approach, type of floor repair and outcomes were recorded. Diplopia, surgical wound infection, hardware loosening and dysesthesia in the infraorbital nerve area were recorded at follow-up.
RESULTS: 43 patients were included: 25 children (0-12 y) and 18 adolescents (13-16 y) (mean age, 11.1 years). Surgical treatment was performed within 24 h in 51 % of the patients, within 24-72 h in 33 %, and beyond 72 h in the remaining. The orbital floor was repaired with a resorbable implant/membrane in 63 % of the patients, open reduction without an implant in 30 %, a titanium mesh implant in 3 adolescent patients. At follow-up (mean 16.3 months), 14 patients had residual diplopia in the upper fields, only two of these resolved within 6 months.
DISCUSSION: A tendency toward an increased incidence of postoperative diplopia with longer intervals between trauma and surgery was observed. This study showed different choices regarding the material placed on the floor, with a preference for open reduction without implants in children, compared to the use of resorbable implants or membranes in adolescents.