Periodontal conditions and oral symptoms in gutka-chewers with and without type 2 diabetes.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
The aim of the study was to investigate the periodontal conditions and oral symptoms among gutka-chewers in subjects with and without type 2 diabetes (T2D).
MATERIAL AND
METHODS
Subjects aged between 45 and 64 years were included. "Gutka-chewers" were defined as subjects who had been chewing at least one sachet of gutka daily for at least 12 months. Subjects who reported never to have used tobacco in any form were categorized as "non-chewers". Periodontal conditions (plaque index [PI], bleeding on probing [BOP], and probing depth [PD] [4 mm<6 mm and > or =6 mm]), number of missing teeth, oral symptoms, reasons for gutka use, and random blood glucose levels were recorded. Exclusion criteria were smoking and use of antibiotics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and steroids.
RESULTS
Mean durations of gutka use in subjects with and without T2D were 10.5 (range 8.0-15.5 years) and 8.4 (range 6.0-20.2 years) years correspondingly. In subjects with T2D, gutka-chewers (n=29) and non-chewers (n=44) showed no difference in periodontal conditions, missing teeth, and gingival bleeding. In subjects without T2D, gutka-chewers (n=36) had increased PI (p<0.01), BOP (p<0.001), PD (4 mm<6 mm) (p<0.01), number of missing teeth, and gingival bleeding (p<0.01) compared to non-chewers (n=42). Non-chewers in subjects with T2D had poorer periodontal conditions and increased oral symptoms compared to gutka-chewers and non-chewers in subjects without T2D.
CONCLUSION
In subjects without T2D, gutka-chewers have severe periodontal conditions and oral symptoms compared to non-chewers. In subjects with T2D, the severity of these variables is related to glycemic levels rather than gutka consumption.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.