Mechanisms of ageing and development · 2026
Identifying biomarkers of accelerated ageing in cancer patients from routine clinical data.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bottomley Clodagh, Liuu Evelyne, Echarte Archanco Beatriz, Harari Danielle, Kalsi Tania, de Pablo Gallega Carlos, Welch Carly
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Cancer and ageing have a bidirectional relationship: age is the strongest risk factor for cancer, and cancer and treatments can accelerate ageing. Therefore, biological age can differ from chronological age; biomarkers are needed to stratify interventions to minimise accelerated ageing.
METHODS: PhenoAge was calculated from routine blood test results of patients attending a Geriatric Oncology clinic. PhenoAgeAccel was the residual from a regression of PhenoAge against age.
RESULTS: Data were available for 173 patients (62% male). Mean PhenoAge was higher than age (84.3 (12.6) vs 76.2 (7.24), p < 0.001), though the two were correlated (r = 0.579, p < 0.001). Unlike age, PhenoAge and PhenoAgeAccel were associated with one-year mortality (PhenoAge OR=1.083, 95% CI: 1.038-1.136; PhenoAgeAccel OR=1.096, 95% CI: 1.047-1.155). PhenoAge correlated with Clinical Frailty Score and Timed Up and Go (CFS: Rs=0.31, p < 0.001; TUG: Rs=0.25, p < 0.005); there were no correlations with age. PhenoAgeAccel correlated with the number of CGA interventions made (Rs=0.17, p < 0.05), unlike age and PhenoAge. Patients with diabetes mellitus had a higher PhenoAgeAccel compared to those without (3.40 vs -1.71, p = 0.002). In patients receiving systemic anti-cancer treatment, patients with PhenoAgeAccel calculated pre-treatment had less age acceleration than those with PhenoAgeAccel calculated post-treatment, both overall (2.18 vs -2.87; p = 0.048) and in matched samples (n = 21, 7.76 vs -2.87, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: PhenoAgeAccel is a greater predictor of risk than chronological age in older people with cancer. This makes it a promising biomarker to stratify patients for holistic geriatric assessment, dose reductions, or future geroprotective measures which could be integrated within electronic healthcare record systems.
METHODS: PhenoAge was calculated from routine blood test results of patients attending a Geriatric Oncology clinic. PhenoAgeAccel was the residual from a regression of PhenoAge against age.
RESULTS: Data were available for 173 patients (62% male). Mean PhenoAge was higher than age (84.3 (12.6) vs 76.2 (7.24), p < 0.001), though the two were correlated (r = 0.579, p < 0.001). Unlike age, PhenoAge and PhenoAgeAccel were associated with one-year mortality (PhenoAge OR=1.083, 95% CI: 1.038-1.136; PhenoAgeAccel OR=1.096, 95% CI: 1.047-1.155). PhenoAge correlated with Clinical Frailty Score and Timed Up and Go (CFS: Rs=0.31, p < 0.001; TUG: Rs=0.25, p < 0.005); there were no correlations with age. PhenoAgeAccel correlated with the number of CGA interventions made (Rs=0.17, p < 0.05), unlike age and PhenoAge. Patients with diabetes mellitus had a higher PhenoAgeAccel compared to those without (3.40 vs -1.71, p = 0.002). In patients receiving systemic anti-cancer treatment, patients with PhenoAgeAccel calculated pre-treatment had less age acceleration than those with PhenoAgeAccel calculated post-treatment, both overall (2.18 vs -2.87; p = 0.048) and in matched samples (n = 21, 7.76 vs -2.87, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: PhenoAgeAccel is a greater predictor of risk than chronological age in older people with cancer. This makes it a promising biomarker to stratify patients for holistic geriatric assessment, dose reductions, or future geroprotective measures which could be integrated within electronic healthcare record systems.