Pediatric surgery international · 2016
5 years after an ACE: what happens then?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chong Clara, Featherstone Neil, Sharif Shazia, Cherian Abraham, Cuckow Peter, Mushtaq Imran, De Coppi Paolo, Cross Kate, Curry Joseph
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Antegrade continence enema (ACE) revolutionised the lives of children with chronic constipation and soiling. Parents often ask how long the ACE will be required. We looked at our patients 5 years after ACE formation to answer the question.
METHODS: We reviewed clinical notes of all patients undergoing ACE procedure during January 1990 to December 2010. Only patients with >5 years follow-up were included. Data are given as median (range).
RESULTS: 133 patients were included with >5 years of follow-up. Primary pathology was anorectal anomaly (ARA) 64 (48%); spinal dysraphism (SD) 40 (30%); functional constipation (FC) 14 (10%); Hirschsprung's Disease (HD) 10 (8%) and others 5 (4%). Median follow-up was 7 years (5-17 years). Overall 74% still use their ACE; whilst 26% no longer access their stoma, of whom 47% recovered normal colonic function. 50% of HD patient recover colonic function. FC has the highest failure rate at 21%.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall 86% achieved excellent clinical outcome with 74% of patient still using their ACE at 5 years. HD has the highest recovery rate of 50%. FC has a more unreliable clinical outcome with 21% recovered colonic function and 21% failed. Outcome varied dependent on the background diagnosis.
METHODS: We reviewed clinical notes of all patients undergoing ACE procedure during January 1990 to December 2010. Only patients with >5 years follow-up were included. Data are given as median (range).
RESULTS: 133 patients were included with >5 years of follow-up. Primary pathology was anorectal anomaly (ARA) 64 (48%); spinal dysraphism (SD) 40 (30%); functional constipation (FC) 14 (10%); Hirschsprung's Disease (HD) 10 (8%) and others 5 (4%). Median follow-up was 7 years (5-17 years). Overall 74% still use their ACE; whilst 26% no longer access their stoma, of whom 47% recovered normal colonic function. 50% of HD patient recover colonic function. FC has the highest failure rate at 21%.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall 86% achieved excellent clinical outcome with 74% of patient still using their ACE at 5 years. HD has the highest recovery rate of 50%. FC has a more unreliable clinical outcome with 21% recovered colonic function and 21% failed. Outcome varied dependent on the background diagnosis.