Clinical nuclear medicine · 2020
Comparison of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT and Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Follow-up Assessment of Juvenile Nasal Angiofibroma-A Novel Pilot Study.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Thakar Alok, Sakthivel Pirabu, Arunraj Sreedharan Thankarajan, Bhalla Ashu Seith, Kakkar Aanchal, Kumar Rakesh, Kumar Rakesh
Аннотация
PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: The specific identification of residual/recurrent juvenile nasal angiofibroma (JNA) following surgical treatment remains difficult. Contrast MRI and CT may not enable the differentiation of tumor from postsurgical reparative tissue. Functional imaging with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT targeting tumor-associated neovasculature has recently demonstrated universal positive uptake in primary JNA and offers promise of greater accuracy in the detection or exclusion of recurrent/residual JNA.
METHODS: In this prospective study, 18 postsurgical JNA patients with high suspicion for residual disease evinced by follow-up MR scan, or nasal endoscopy, or recent epistaxis during September 2018-November 2019 were included. All patients underwent head and neck spot PSMA PET/CT imaging. Postcontrast enhancement of a definite lesion was considered as a criterion for residual/recurrent tumor in contrast-enhanced MRI (CEMRI). In PSMA PET/CT, any abnormal uptake apart from physiological sites in the head and neck was considered as residual lesions. Radiological results were categorized as negative, suspicious, and residual/recurrent tumors. Any discrepancy between CEMRI and PSMA was resolved by surgical biopsies. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were separately calculated for CEMRI and PSMA PET/CT for diagnosing residual lesions. The interrater agreement κ value was also calculated.
RESULTS: On CEMRI evaluation, 14 of 18 patients had residual tumors, 2 had suspicious residual lesions, and 2 had normal postoperative scans. On PSMA PET/CT, 12 of 18 patients had residual tumors, and 6 had normal negative scans. Surgical biopsy in all 4 discordant cases was negative for tumors and revealed only fibrosis. In 1 patient with residual tumor on both scans, discrepancy was noted with regard to tumor extent demonstrated by the 2 scans, and further surgical excision confirmed the imaging findings of PSMA PET/CT as accurate. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of CEMRI were 100%, 33.33%, and 75% and 100%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of PSMA PET/CT were 100% for all parameters. The interrater agreement between the 2 tests (κ) is 0.5 (95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.81).
CONCLUSIONS: The Ga-PSMA PET/CT is noted as more specific than the current standard of CEMRI in the identification of residual/recurrent JNA. It is the first radionuclide imaging scan that has found application in postoperative assessment of JNA.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2018/08/015479).
METHODS: In this prospective study, 18 postsurgical JNA patients with high suspicion for residual disease evinced by follow-up MR scan, or nasal endoscopy, or recent epistaxis during September 2018-November 2019 were included. All patients underwent head and neck spot PSMA PET/CT imaging. Postcontrast enhancement of a definite lesion was considered as a criterion for residual/recurrent tumor in contrast-enhanced MRI (CEMRI). In PSMA PET/CT, any abnormal uptake apart from physiological sites in the head and neck was considered as residual lesions. Radiological results were categorized as negative, suspicious, and residual/recurrent tumors. Any discrepancy between CEMRI and PSMA was resolved by surgical biopsies. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were separately calculated for CEMRI and PSMA PET/CT for diagnosing residual lesions. The interrater agreement κ value was also calculated.
RESULTS: On CEMRI evaluation, 14 of 18 patients had residual tumors, 2 had suspicious residual lesions, and 2 had normal postoperative scans. On PSMA PET/CT, 12 of 18 patients had residual tumors, and 6 had normal negative scans. Surgical biopsy in all 4 discordant cases was negative for tumors and revealed only fibrosis. In 1 patient with residual tumor on both scans, discrepancy was noted with regard to tumor extent demonstrated by the 2 scans, and further surgical excision confirmed the imaging findings of PSMA PET/CT as accurate. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of CEMRI were 100%, 33.33%, and 75% and 100%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of PSMA PET/CT were 100% for all parameters. The interrater agreement between the 2 tests (κ) is 0.5 (95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.81).
CONCLUSIONS: The Ga-PSMA PET/CT is noted as more specific than the current standard of CEMRI in the identification of residual/recurrent JNA. It is the first radionuclide imaging scan that has found application in postoperative assessment of JNA.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2018/08/015479).