Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2011
Ajmaline challenge in young individuals with suspected Brugada syndrome.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sorgente Antonio, Sarkozy Andrea, De Asmundis Carlo, Chierchia Gian-Battista, Capulzini Lucio, Paparella Gaetano, Henkens Stefan, Brugada Pedro
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The clinical characteristics and the results of ajmaline challenge in young individuals with suspected Brugada syndrome (BS) have not been systematically investigated.
METHODS: Among a larger series of patients included in the BS database of our Department, 179 patients undergoing ajmaline challenge were included in the study and categorized in two groups according to age: group 1 (<18 years old) and group 2 (≥18 years old). Clinical features and results of the ajmaline challenge of each group were compared.
RESULTS: Young individuals were more often asymptomatic compared to adult patients (P = 0.002). They showed a higher number of normal ECGs (P = 0.023), a lower percentage of Brugada type II electrocardiographic pattern compared to the adult population (P = 0.011), and a comparable amount of spontaneous Brugada type III electrocardiographic pattern (P = 0.695). Ajmaline provoked a higher degree of intraventricular conduction delay (P = 0.002) and higher degree of prolongation of the ventricular repolarization phase (P = 0.013) in young individuals but its pro-arrhythmic risk was comparable in the two groups (P = 0.684). Furthermore, inducibility of ventricular arrhythmias in young patients with a positive ajmaline test was comparable to that of the adults with a positive ajmaline test (P = 0.694).
CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates the low-risk profile of the ajmaline test in young patients when performed by experienced physicians and nurses in an appropriate environment.
METHODS: Among a larger series of patients included in the BS database of our Department, 179 patients undergoing ajmaline challenge were included in the study and categorized in two groups according to age: group 1 (<18 years old) and group 2 (≥18 years old). Clinical features and results of the ajmaline challenge of each group were compared.
RESULTS: Young individuals were more often asymptomatic compared to adult patients (P = 0.002). They showed a higher number of normal ECGs (P = 0.023), a lower percentage of Brugada type II electrocardiographic pattern compared to the adult population (P = 0.011), and a comparable amount of spontaneous Brugada type III electrocardiographic pattern (P = 0.695). Ajmaline provoked a higher degree of intraventricular conduction delay (P = 0.002) and higher degree of prolongation of the ventricular repolarization phase (P = 0.013) in young individuals but its pro-arrhythmic risk was comparable in the two groups (P = 0.684). Furthermore, inducibility of ventricular arrhythmias in young patients with a positive ajmaline test was comparable to that of the adults with a positive ajmaline test (P = 0.694).
CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates the low-risk profile of the ajmaline test in young patients when performed by experienced physicians and nurses in an appropriate environment.