European journal of clinical investigation · 2021
Gut microbiota profiles and the role of anti-CdtB and anti-vinculin antibodies in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID).
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vasapolli Riccardo, Schulz Christian, Schweden Melanie, Casèn Christina, Kirubakaran Graceline Tina, Kirste Katrine Hånes, Macke Lukas, Link Alexander, Schütte Kerstin, Malfertheiner Peter
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Distinct faecal microbiota profiles are reported to be associated with various subtypes of IBS. Circulating antibodies to cytolethal distending toxin B (CdtB) and vinculin are proposed as biomarkers to identify post-infectious IBS. The aim of our study was to analyse serum levels of anti-CdtB and anti-vinculin antibodies in patients with different functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) and their correlation with the composition of faecal microbiome.
METHODS: The study cohort comprised 65 prospectively recruited individuals: 15 with diarrhoea-type-IBS (IBS-D), 13 with constipation-type-IBS (IBS-C), 15 with functional dyspepsia (FD) and 22 healthy controls. FGID subgroups were defined according to Rome III criteria. Serum levels of anti-CdtB and anti-vinculin antibodies were measured by ELISA. Faecal microbiome composition analysis and assessment of dysbiosis were performed by GA-map® Dysbiosis Test.
RESULTS: Positivity rate either for anti-CdtB or anti-vinculin antibodies was higher in the IBS-C group (76.9%) compared to IBS-D (40.0%), FD (60%) and healthy (63.6%) groups. Dysbiosis was more frequent in subjects positive for anti-CdtB antibodies and in IBS-C patients, who showed an increased amount of opportunistic/pro-inflammatory bacteria and reduced gut protective bacteria. IBS-C patients showed a high inter-individual variation of bacterial communities compared to other FGID subgroups and healthy individuals, whereas microbial profiles of patients with IBS-D and FD were overlapping with those of healthy controls. No bacteria markers showed significant differences between FGID subgroups and healthy controls.
CONCLUSION: Neither anti-CdtB/anti-vinculin antibodies nor faecal microbial profiles allowed to discriminate between specific FGID subgroups. Dysbiosis was more frequent in patients presenting with anti-CdtB antibodies and in IBS-C patients.
METHODS: The study cohort comprised 65 prospectively recruited individuals: 15 with diarrhoea-type-IBS (IBS-D), 13 with constipation-type-IBS (IBS-C), 15 with functional dyspepsia (FD) and 22 healthy controls. FGID subgroups were defined according to Rome III criteria. Serum levels of anti-CdtB and anti-vinculin antibodies were measured by ELISA. Faecal microbiome composition analysis and assessment of dysbiosis were performed by GA-map® Dysbiosis Test.
RESULTS: Positivity rate either for anti-CdtB or anti-vinculin antibodies was higher in the IBS-C group (76.9%) compared to IBS-D (40.0%), FD (60%) and healthy (63.6%) groups. Dysbiosis was more frequent in subjects positive for anti-CdtB antibodies and in IBS-C patients, who showed an increased amount of opportunistic/pro-inflammatory bacteria and reduced gut protective bacteria. IBS-C patients showed a high inter-individual variation of bacterial communities compared to other FGID subgroups and healthy individuals, whereas microbial profiles of patients with IBS-D and FD were overlapping with those of healthy controls. No bacteria markers showed significant differences between FGID subgroups and healthy controls.
CONCLUSION: Neither anti-CdtB/anti-vinculin antibodies nor faecal microbial profiles allowed to discriminate between specific FGID subgroups. Dysbiosis was more frequent in patients presenting with anti-CdtB antibodies and in IBS-C patients.