Andrology · 2024
Innovative all-in-one exome sequencing strategy for diagnostic genetic testing in male infertility: Validation and 10-month experience.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Oud Manon S, de Leeuw Nicole, Smeets Dominique F C M, Ramos Liliana, van der Heijden Godfried W, Timmermans Raoul G J, van de Vorst Maartje, Hofste Tom, Kempers Marlies J E, Stokman Marijn F, D'Hauwers Kathleen W M, Faas Brigitte H W, Westra Dineke
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines indicate that patients with extreme oligozoospermia or azoospermia should be tested for chromosomal imbalances, azoospermia factor (AZF) deletions and/or CFTR variants. For other sperm abnormalities, no genetic diagnostics are recommended.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether exome sequencing (ES) with combined copy number variant (CNV) and single nucleotide variant (SNV) analysis is a reliable first-tier method to replace current methods (validation study), and to evaluate the diagnostic yield after 10 months of implementation (evaluation study).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the validation study, ES was performed on DNA of patients already diagnosed with AZF deletions (n = 17), (non-)mosaic sex chromosomal aneuploidies or structural chromosomal anomalies (n = 37), CFTR variants (n = 26), or variants in known infertility genes (n = 4), and 90 controls. The data were analyzed using our standard diagnostic pipeline, with a bioinformatic filter for 130 male infertility genes. In the evaluation study, results of 292 clinical exomes were included.
RESULTS: All previously reported variants in the validation cohort, including clinically relevant Y-chromosomal microdeletions, were correctly identified and reliably detected. In the evaluation study, we identified one or more clinically relevant genetic anomalies in 67 of 292 of all cases (22.9%): these included aberrations that could have been detected with current methods in 30 of 67 patients (10.2% of total), (possible) (mono)genetic causes in the male infertility gene panel in 28 of 67 patients (9.6%), and carriership of cystic fibrosis in nine of 67 patients (3.1%).
CONCLUSION: ES is a reliable first-tier method to detect the most common genetic causes of male infertility and, as additional genetic causes can be detected, in our evaluation cohort the diagnostic yield almost doubled (10.2%-19.8%, excluding CF carriers). A genetic diagnosis provides answers on the cause of infertility and helps the professionals in the counseling for treatment, possible co-morbidities and risk for offspring and/or family members. Karyotyping will still remain necessary for detecting balanced translocations or low-grade chromosomal mosaicism.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether exome sequencing (ES) with combined copy number variant (CNV) and single nucleotide variant (SNV) analysis is a reliable first-tier method to replace current methods (validation study), and to evaluate the diagnostic yield after 10 months of implementation (evaluation study).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the validation study, ES was performed on DNA of patients already diagnosed with AZF deletions (n = 17), (non-)mosaic sex chromosomal aneuploidies or structural chromosomal anomalies (n = 37), CFTR variants (n = 26), or variants in known infertility genes (n = 4), and 90 controls. The data were analyzed using our standard diagnostic pipeline, with a bioinformatic filter for 130 male infertility genes. In the evaluation study, results of 292 clinical exomes were included.
RESULTS: All previously reported variants in the validation cohort, including clinically relevant Y-chromosomal microdeletions, were correctly identified and reliably detected. In the evaluation study, we identified one or more clinically relevant genetic anomalies in 67 of 292 of all cases (22.9%): these included aberrations that could have been detected with current methods in 30 of 67 patients (10.2% of total), (possible) (mono)genetic causes in the male infertility gene panel in 28 of 67 patients (9.6%), and carriership of cystic fibrosis in nine of 67 patients (3.1%).
CONCLUSION: ES is a reliable first-tier method to detect the most common genetic causes of male infertility and, as additional genetic causes can be detected, in our evaluation cohort the diagnostic yield almost doubled (10.2%-19.8%, excluding CF carriers). A genetic diagnosis provides answers on the cause of infertility and helps the professionals in the counseling for treatment, possible co-morbidities and risk for offspring and/or family members. Karyotyping will still remain necessary for detecting balanced translocations or low-grade chromosomal mosaicism.