International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology · 2022
Protective effects of nigella sativa oil against gentamicin-induced ototoxicity in rats: A dose-ranging study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tuna Bilge, Tüzemen Gökhan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Aminoglycosides are relatively potent antibiotics used against some life-threatening infections but contribute to ototoxicity. Although the beneficial effects of high-dose nigella sativa oil (NSO) on ototoxicity in the form of intratympanic or oral use have been demonstrated, no variable-dose studies have been conducted on this subject. We aimed to investigate the potential protective effect of different doses of intraperitoneal (i.p.) NSO on Gentamicin (GM)-induced ototoxicity with auditory brainstem responses (ABR) testing.
METHODS: Thirty adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (300-400 gr) were used in this study. Rats were randomly divided into 5 groups, with six animals in each group: All the groups received GM (120 mg/kg i.p) for ten days. Group 1: 0.9% saline solution (0.3 ml/kg i.p.), Group 2: NSOL (low dose 0.1 ml/kg i.p.), Group 3: NSOM (median dose 0.3 ml/kg i.p.), Group 4: NSOH (high dose 3 ml/kg i.p.), Group 5: NSOML (late onset median dose 0.3 ml/kg i.p) were given for fifteen days. But death occurred in 3 rats in group 4 and they were excluded from the study. The pretreatment and posttreatment ABR testings were performed.
RESULTS: The posttreatment ABR results were compared with the pretreatment values. A significant difference was found in group 1 (p:0,002), group 2 (p: 0,040), and group 4 (p: 0,027). When the posttreatment tests were compared with each other, there was a significant difference between groups 1 and 2 (p < 0,001), groups 1 and 3 (p < 0,001), and groups 1 and 5 (p < 0,001).
CONCLUSIONS: The administration of 0.1 ml/kg and 3 ml/kg dose of NSO does not prevent ototoxicity. The 0.3 ml/kg dose of NSO effectively prevents GM-induced ototoxicity within both prophylactic and therapeutic use.
METHODS: Thirty adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (300-400 gr) were used in this study. Rats were randomly divided into 5 groups, with six animals in each group: All the groups received GM (120 mg/kg i.p) for ten days. Group 1: 0.9% saline solution (0.3 ml/kg i.p.), Group 2: NSOL (low dose 0.1 ml/kg i.p.), Group 3: NSOM (median dose 0.3 ml/kg i.p.), Group 4: NSOH (high dose 3 ml/kg i.p.), Group 5: NSOML (late onset median dose 0.3 ml/kg i.p) were given for fifteen days. But death occurred in 3 rats in group 4 and they were excluded from the study. The pretreatment and posttreatment ABR testings were performed.
RESULTS: The posttreatment ABR results were compared with the pretreatment values. A significant difference was found in group 1 (p:0,002), group 2 (p: 0,040), and group 4 (p: 0,027). When the posttreatment tests were compared with each other, there was a significant difference between groups 1 and 2 (p < 0,001), groups 1 and 3 (p < 0,001), and groups 1 and 5 (p < 0,001).
CONCLUSIONS: The administration of 0.1 ml/kg and 3 ml/kg dose of NSO does not prevent ototoxicity. The 0.3 ml/kg dose of NSO effectively prevents GM-induced ototoxicity within both prophylactic and therapeutic use.