MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/1806-9282.61.03.258

Медицинская библиотека · Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2015

Evidences in the treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Oliveira Matheus Fernandes de, Reis Rodolfo Casimiro, Trindade Evelinda Marramon, Pinto Fernando Campos Gomes

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) is characterized by gait apraxia, cognitive dysfunction and urinary incontinence. There are two main treatment options: ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) and endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV). However, there are doubts about which modality is superior and what type of valve should be applied. We are summarizing the current evidence in INPH treatment.

METHODS

an electronic search of the literature was conducted on the Medline, Embase, Scielo and Lilacs databases from 1966 to the present to obtain data published about INPH treatment.

RESULTS

the treatment is based on three pillars: conservative, ETV and VPS. The conservative option has fallen into disuse after various studies showing good results after surgical intervention. ETV is an acceptable mode of treatment, but the superiority of VPS has made the latter the gold standard.

CONCLUSION

well-designed studies with a high level of appropriate evidence are still scarce, but the current gold standard for treatment of INPH is conducted using VPS.

Для цитирования: Oliveira Matheus Fernandes de, Reis Rodolfo Casimiro, Trindade Evelinda Marramon, Pinto Fernando Campos Gomes. Evidences in the treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.. Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992). 2015. DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.61.03.258.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.