MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/oncolo/oyae195

Медицинская библиотека · The oncologist · 2024

Unique brain injury patterns after proton vs photon radiotherapy for WHO grade 2-3 gliomas.

Winter Sebastian F, Gardner Melissa M, Karschnia Philipp, Vaios Eugene J, Grassberger Clemens, Bussière Marc R, Nikolic Katarina, Pongpitakmetha Thanakit, Ehret Felix, Kaul David, Boehmerle Wolfgang, Endres Matthias, Shih Helen A, Parsons Michael W, Dietrich Jorg

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Central nervous system (CNS) injury following brain-directed radiotherapy remains a major challenge. Proton radiotherapy (PRT) minimizes radiation to healthy brain, potentially limiting sequelae. We characterized CNS radiotoxicity, including radiation-induced leukoencephalopathy (RIL), brain tissue necrosis (TN), and cerebral microbleeds (CMB), in glioma patients treated with PRT or photons (XRT).

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Thirty-four patients (19 male; median age 39.6 years) with WHO grade 2-3 gliomas treated with partial cranial radiotherapy (XRT [n = 17] vs PRT[n = 17]) were identified and matched by demographic/clinical criteria. Radiotoxicity was assessed longitudinally for 3 years post-radiotherapy via serial analysis of T2/FLAIR- (for RIL), contrast-enhanced T1- (for TN), and susceptibility (for CMB)-weighted MRI sequences. RIL was rated at whole-brain and hemispheric levels using a novel Fazekas scale-informed scoring system.

RESULTS

The scoring system proved reliable (ICC > 0.85). Both groups developed moderate-to-severe RIL (62%[XRT]; 71%[PRT]) within 3 years; however, XRT was associated with persistent RIL increases in the contralesional hemisphere, whereas contralesional hemispheric RIL plateaued with PRT at 1-year post-radiotherapy (t = 2.180; P = .037). TN rates were greater with PRT (6%[XRT] vs 18%[PRT]; P = ns). CMB prevalence (76%[XRT]; 71%[PRT]) and burden (mean #CMB: 4.0[XRT]; 4.2[PRT]) were similar; however, XRT correlated with greater contralesional hemispheric CMB burden (27%[XRT]; 17%[PRT]; X2 = 4.986; P = .026), whereas PRT-specific CMB clustered at the radiation field margin (X2 = 14.7; P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

CNS radiotoxicity is common and progressive in glioma patients. Injury patterns suggest radiation modality-specificity as RIL, TN, and CMB exhibit unique spatiotemporal differences following XRT vs PRT, likely reflecting underlying dosimetric and radiobiological differences. Familiarity with such injury patterns is essential to improve patient management. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and assess their impacts on neurocognitive function.

Для цитирования: Winter Sebastian F, Gardner Melissa M, Karschnia Philipp, Vaios Eugene J, Grassberger Clemens, Bussière Marc R, Nikolic Katarina, Pongpitakmetha Thanakit, Ehret Felix, Kaul David, Boehmerle Wolfgang, Endres Matthias, Shih Helen A, Parsons Michael W, Dietrich Jorg. Unique brain injury patterns after proton vs photon radiotherapy for WHO grade 2-3 gliomas.. The oncologist. 2024. DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae195.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.