MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/imj.14115

Медицинская библиотека · Internal medicine journal · 2019

Chemotherapy and biologic use in the routine management of metastatic colorectal cancer in Australia: is clinical practice following the evidence?

Semira Christine, Wong Hui-Li, Field Kathryn, Lee Margaret, Lee Belinda, Nott Louise, Shapiro Jeremy, Wong Rachel, Tie Jeanne, Tran Ben, Richardson Gary, Zimet Allan, Lipton Lara, Tamjid Babak, Burge Matthew, Ma Brigette, Johns Julie, Harold Michael, Gibbs Peter

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Emerging evidence on the optimal use of chemotherapy and biologics in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer should impact management in routine care. Recent studies have demonstrated benefits for initial triplet chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan, FOLFOXIRI) and for initial treatment with an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (EGFRi) in patients with a RAS wild-type tumour and a left-sided primary tumour.

AIM: To explore evolving pattern of metastatic colorectal cancer care over time in Australia.

METHODS

We analysed data from the Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer registry.

RESULTS

From July 2009 to December 2017, 2552 metastatic colorectal cancer patients were entered into the Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer registry. Of 1585 patients who initially underwent chemotherapy, treatment was with a doublet in 76%. FOLFOXIRI was given to 22 patients (1.4%), mostly young patients and those with potentially resectable disease. Along with first-line chemotherapy, 61% received bevacizumab, while 3.3% received an EGFRi, predominantly over the last 2 years. Within the KRAS wild-type left-sided tumour cohort, EGFRi use increased from 9% in 2015 to 37% in 2017. Across treatment sites, there was a wide variation in the utilisation of FOLFOXIRI and EGFRi therapy; bevacizumab use was more consistent. A clear impact on survival outcomes from these regimens is not evident, potentially due to multiple confounders.

CONCLUSION

Doublet chemotherapy + bevacizumab remains the dominant initial strategy, with limited uptake of triplet chemotherapy and of EGFRi. Potential explanations include uncertainty about the significance of post hoc analyses for EGFRi and concerns regarding adverse events for both strategies.

Для цитирования: Semira Christine, Wong Hui-Li, Field Kathryn, Lee Margaret, Lee Belinda, Nott Louise, Shapiro Jeremy, Wong Rachel, Tie Jeanne, Tran Ben, Richardson Gary, Zimet Allan, Lipton Lara, Tamjid Babak, Burge Matthew, Ma Brigette, Johns Julie, Harold Michael, Gibbs Peter. Chemotherapy and biologic use in the routine management of metastatic colorectal cancer in Australia: is clinical practice following the evidence?. Internal medicine journal. 2019. DOI: 10.1111/imj.14115.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.