Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society · 2024
Characteristics and Usefulness of Neurophysiological Monitoring in Corrective Procedures for Abnormally Curved Spine in Young Patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Michaeli Avner, Miller Sara, Danto Joseph, Arzi Harel, Schroeder Josh E, Ovadia Dror
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To identify and characterize events of deterioration in intraoperative neuromonitoring data during correction procedures for thoracic and lumbar abnormal spinal curvature in young patients.
METHODS: Records of 1,127 cases were retrospectively reviewed to identify events with deterioration of the neuromonitoring data. General etiological and demographic variables were summarized, and neuromonitoring events were studied and characterized.
RESULTS: Adolescent idiopathic cases were associated with female dominance and older age. Nonadolescent idiopathic cases were associated with a higher rate of neuromonitoring events. The neuromonitoring events evolved during the different procedural stages, were primarily reflected in the motor-evoked potential data and affected a range of neural structures to varying degrees. Most of the events were resolved, partially or completely, following a corresponding intervention by the surgical team, before the end of the procedure. Significant immediate weakness of the lower extremities was demonstrated in patients with unresolved neuromonitoring events, most of them were nonadolescent idiopathic patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Neurophysiological monitoring enables the intraoperative assessment of the integrity of neural pathways and allows the detection of surgery-related impending neural injuries. Neuromonitoring contributes to intraoperative decision making, either when data are uneventful and allow confident continuation or when data deteriorate and lead to corresponding intervention. Further awareness should be paid to the vulnerable characteristics of the patient, surgery course, and neuromonitoring data. Proper interpretation of the neuromonitoring data, together with corresponding intervention by the surgeon when necessary, has the potential to reduce postoperative neurological insults and improve clinical outcomes.
METHODS: Records of 1,127 cases were retrospectively reviewed to identify events with deterioration of the neuromonitoring data. General etiological and demographic variables were summarized, and neuromonitoring events were studied and characterized.
RESULTS: Adolescent idiopathic cases were associated with female dominance and older age. Nonadolescent idiopathic cases were associated with a higher rate of neuromonitoring events. The neuromonitoring events evolved during the different procedural stages, were primarily reflected in the motor-evoked potential data and affected a range of neural structures to varying degrees. Most of the events were resolved, partially or completely, following a corresponding intervention by the surgical team, before the end of the procedure. Significant immediate weakness of the lower extremities was demonstrated in patients with unresolved neuromonitoring events, most of them were nonadolescent idiopathic patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Neurophysiological monitoring enables the intraoperative assessment of the integrity of neural pathways and allows the detection of surgery-related impending neural injuries. Neuromonitoring contributes to intraoperative decision making, either when data are uneventful and allow confident continuation or when data deteriorate and lead to corresponding intervention. Further awareness should be paid to the vulnerable characteristics of the patient, surgery course, and neuromonitoring data. Proper interpretation of the neuromonitoring data, together with corresponding intervention by the surgeon when necessary, has the potential to reduce postoperative neurological insults and improve clinical outcomes.