The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2022
Estimation of neonatal body fat percentage predicts neonatal hypothermia better than birthweight centile.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Banting Sarah A, Dane Kirsten M, Charlton Julia K, Tong Stephen, Hui Lisa, Middleton Anna L, Gibson Lara K, Walker Susan P, MacDonald Teresa M
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: PEA POD™ air displacement plethysmography quickly and noninvasively estimates neonatal body fat percentage (BF%). Low PEA POD™ BF% predicts morbidity better than classification as small-for-gestational-age (SGA; <10th centile), but PEA PODs are not widely available. We examined whether skinfold measurements could effectively identify neonates at risk; comparing skinfold BF%, PEA POD™ BF% and birthweight centiles' prediction of hypothermia - a marker of reduced in utero nutrition.
METHODS: Neonates had customized birthweight centiles calculated, and BF% prospectively estimated by: (i) triceps and subscapular skinfolds using sex-specific equations; and (ii) PEA POD™. Medical record review identified hypothermic (<36.5 °C) episodes.
RESULTS: 42/149 (28%) neonates had hypothermia. Skinfold BF%, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.66, predicted hypothermia as well as PEA POD™ BF% (AUC = 0.62) and birthweight centile (AUC = 0.61). Birthweight <10th centile demonstrated 11.9% sensitivity, 38.5% positive predictive value (PPV) and 92.5% specificity for hypothermia. At equal specificity, skinfold and PEA POD™ BF% more than doubled sensitivity (26.2%) and PPV increased to 57.9%.
CONCLUSION: Neonatal BF% performs better to predict neonatal hypothermia than birthweight centile, and may be a better measure of true fetal growth restriction. Estimation of neonatal BF% by skinfold measurements is an inexpensive alternative to PEA POD™.
METHODS: Neonates had customized birthweight centiles calculated, and BF% prospectively estimated by: (i) triceps and subscapular skinfolds using sex-specific equations; and (ii) PEA POD™. Medical record review identified hypothermic (<36.5 °C) episodes.
RESULTS: 42/149 (28%) neonates had hypothermia. Skinfold BF%, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.66, predicted hypothermia as well as PEA POD™ BF% (AUC = 0.62) and birthweight centile (AUC = 0.61). Birthweight <10th centile demonstrated 11.9% sensitivity, 38.5% positive predictive value (PPV) and 92.5% specificity for hypothermia. At equal specificity, skinfold and PEA POD™ BF% more than doubled sensitivity (26.2%) and PPV increased to 57.9%.
CONCLUSION: Neonatal BF% performs better to predict neonatal hypothermia than birthweight centile, and may be a better measure of true fetal growth restriction. Estimation of neonatal BF% by skinfold measurements is an inexpensive alternative to PEA POD™.