MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.08.040

Медицинская библиотека · World neurosurgery · 2020

Vegetation of Ventriculoatrial Shunt Managed via Multidisciplinary Surgical Approach.

Entezami Pouya, Devejian Neil S, Rubino Sebastian, Smith Nathan, Savery Patrick, Crnkovic Anica, Adamo Matthew A

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

The popularity of the ventriculoatrial shunt as a means for cerebrospinal fluid diversion was temporally limited, overcome by the success of the peritoneum as a site for distal drainage. Nevertheless, it remains an important tool for patients for whom ventriculoperitoneal shunting is not an option.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 9-year-old girl with a ventriculoatrial shunt, who had undergone multiple revisions. Ultimately, she suffered a wound dehiscence, resulting in infectious seeding of the bloodstream and formation of a thrombus, presumed granuloma, at the tip of the distal catheter in the right atrium. She underwent successful removal of the lesion via an open approach by our cardiothoracic colleagues.

DISCUSSION: Previous authors have noted a high number of mortalities as a result of these lesions. A collaborative approach resulted in a successful outcome for our patient. Although limited in utility today, the ventriculoatrial shunt remains a common procedure for neurosurgeons today.

CONCLUSION

Recognizing the potential for atrial thrombus formation and using a team approach can help avoid a poor outcome.

Для цитирования: Entezami Pouya, Devejian Neil S, Rubino Sebastian, Smith Nathan, Savery Patrick, Crnkovic Anica, Adamo Matthew A. Vegetation of Ventriculoatrial Shunt Managed via Multidisciplinary Surgical Approach.. World neurosurgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.08.040.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.