The Journal of emergency medicine · 2013
Hemodialysis and extracorporeal removal after pediatric and adolescent poisoning reported to a state poison center.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Darracq Michael A, Cantrell F Lee
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: There is currently limited literature regarding the use of hemodialysis after acute pediatric and adolescent poisoning.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize the use of hemodialysis (HD) and other extracorporeal removal techniques (ECR) in the treatment of acutely poisoned children and adolescents reported to a state poison control system over a 10-year period.
METHODS: After institutional review board approval, a state poison control system database was queried for all cases coded for hemodialysis and other ECR after pediatric and adolescent (0-19 years old) poisoning. We also analyzed National Poison System Data to determine national trends.
RESULTS: Ninety patients were reviewed after exclusions for errors in coding or incomplete documentation. HD was the principle method of ECR employed. One case of hemoperfusion and hemofiltration was reported. HD was used, on average, nine times per year. ECR was used predominantly in adolescent patients (age ≥ to 12 years) (84 patients, 93%) for intentional ingestions (82 patients, 91%). Fifteen different toxins were encountered, with salicylates (29 patients) and ethylene glycol (23 patients) most commonly encountered. Ethylene glycol and methanol blood levels were not available before initiation of hemodialysis in all but one case.
CONCLUSIONS: All salicylate-poisoned patients who underwent HD demonstrated clinical findings indicative of toxicity even in the absence of elevated levels advocated by some as indication for HD. HD and other ECR are rarely used in the management of pediatric and adolescent poisoning.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize the use of hemodialysis (HD) and other extracorporeal removal techniques (ECR) in the treatment of acutely poisoned children and adolescents reported to a state poison control system over a 10-year period.
METHODS: After institutional review board approval, a state poison control system database was queried for all cases coded for hemodialysis and other ECR after pediatric and adolescent (0-19 years old) poisoning. We also analyzed National Poison System Data to determine national trends.
RESULTS: Ninety patients were reviewed after exclusions for errors in coding or incomplete documentation. HD was the principle method of ECR employed. One case of hemoperfusion and hemofiltration was reported. HD was used, on average, nine times per year. ECR was used predominantly in adolescent patients (age ≥ to 12 years) (84 patients, 93%) for intentional ingestions (82 patients, 91%). Fifteen different toxins were encountered, with salicylates (29 patients) and ethylene glycol (23 patients) most commonly encountered. Ethylene glycol and methanol blood levels were not available before initiation of hemodialysis in all but one case.
CONCLUSIONS: All salicylate-poisoned patients who underwent HD demonstrated clinical findings indicative of toxicity even in the absence of elevated levels advocated by some as indication for HD. HD and other ECR are rarely used in the management of pediatric and adolescent poisoning.