Comparison of two Specialized Cleft Palate Feeders.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate feeding efficiency and weight gain in infants with cleft palate fed using 1 of the 2 specialty feeders.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Cleft palate clinic in a tertiary pediatric hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Infants with cleft palate (with or without cleft lip) fed using the Medela SpecialNeeds® Feeder (n = 39) or the Dr. Brown's® Specialty Feeding System (n = 16) and who had documented feeding and growth data available from the time of initial assessment in the first month of life and at subsequent follow-up between 2 and 4 months.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Feeding velocity (mL/min).

SECONDARY OUTCOMES MEASURES: Calorie velocity (kcal/min), weight gain, and complications associated with poor feeding.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences in feeding or calorie velocities were identified between infants with cleft palate fed with the Medela SpecialNeeds® feeder and those fed with the Dr. Brown's® feeder. Mean weight z-scores by month did not differ significantly between the 2 bottle groups at the time of initial assessment (P = .84) and follow-up (P = .20). Mean weight z-scores by month for the infants included in this study fell below the 50th percentile. The proportion of infants who developed otitis media, reflux requiring treatment, or who required hospital admission for nasogastric (NG) feeds did not differ significantly between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite being adequately powered for the primary outcome, no significant differences were identified between infants fed with the Medela or the Dr. Brown's feeders in terms of feeding velocity, calorie velocity, weight gain, or complications.