Disability and rehabilitation · 2025
Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor and cognitive function in paediatric brain damage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cerezo-Zarzuelo Almudena, Rios-Lago Marcos, Sanchez-Cuesta Francisco Jose, Gavilan-Agusti Beatriz, Hurtado-Martinez Alfonso, Romero-Muñoz Juan Pablo
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) emerges as a secure therapy in paediatric brain damage rehabilitation. Our purpose is to acknowledge its evidence in motor and cognitive variables, examine correlations between tDCS effects and parameters, and identify associations between motor and cognitive outcomes.
METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023448441). 5 databases were consulted in September 2024. Randomised controlled trials evaluating tDCS effectiveness on motor or cognitive outcomes in paediatric brain injuries were included. Methodological quality was assessed using PEDro scale and ROB-2. Certainty of evidence was assessed by GRADE.
RESULTS: Nineteen studies were selected (447 participants). tDCS seems to be beneficial in gait (SMD: 0.83-0.90 (p < 0.0001)), balance (COP oscillations SMD: -0.51 - -1.13 (p < 0.02), PBS SMD: 0.48-0.56 (p < 0.0001)), functionality (SMD: 0.40 (p < 0.01)). Effects on cognition showed promising results. Effects in upper limb are controversial, due to fewer publications.
CONCLUSIONS: tDCS seems beneficial in motor and cognitive functions in paediatric brain damage. Motor and cognitive functions appears to be interconnected, so combined protocols could be an effective approach. Meta-analysis results are promising but may be considered carefully as few articles could be included. Further research is needed.
METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023448441). 5 databases were consulted in September 2024. Randomised controlled trials evaluating tDCS effectiveness on motor or cognitive outcomes in paediatric brain injuries were included. Methodological quality was assessed using PEDro scale and ROB-2. Certainty of evidence was assessed by GRADE.
RESULTS: Nineteen studies were selected (447 participants). tDCS seems to be beneficial in gait (SMD: 0.83-0.90 (p < 0.0001)), balance (COP oscillations SMD: -0.51 - -1.13 (p < 0.02), PBS SMD: 0.48-0.56 (p < 0.0001)), functionality (SMD: 0.40 (p < 0.01)). Effects on cognition showed promising results. Effects in upper limb are controversial, due to fewer publications.
CONCLUSIONS: tDCS seems beneficial in motor and cognitive functions in paediatric brain damage. Motor and cognitive functions appears to be interconnected, so combined protocols could be an effective approach. Meta-analysis results are promising but may be considered carefully as few articles could be included. Further research is needed.