Comparison of Percutaneous Interventional Ablation-Osteoplasty-Reinforcement-Internal Fixation (AORIF), Long Intramedullary Nailing, and Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Focal Metastatic Osteolytic Lesions in the Femoral Head and Neck.

PURPOSE: Osteolytic metastatic lesions in the femoral head and neck are traditionally treated with intramedullary long nailing (IM) or hemiarthroplasty (HA). Recovery, surgical complications, and medical co-morbidities delay oncologic care. This study sought to elucidate the comparative efficacy of percutaneous ablation-osteoplasty-reinforcement-internal fixation (AORIF), IM, and HA in stabilizing osteolytic lesions in the femoral head and neck.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 67 patients who underwent IM, AORIF, or HA for osteolytic femoral head and neck lesions was performed. Primary outcome was assessed using a combined pain and ambulatory score (Range 1-10: 1 = bedbound, 10 = normal ambulation) at first follow-up (~ 2 weeks). Surgical complications associated with each treatment were compared.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients (mean age, 65 ± 13, 36 men and 31 women) underwent IM (40), AORIF (19), and HA (8) with a mean follow-up of 9 ± 11 months. Two patients in the IM group (5%), three in the AORIF group (16%), and none in the HA (0%) group required revision procedures. AORIF demonstrated superior early improvement in combined pain and ambulatory function scores by 3.0 points [IQR = 2.0] (IM p = 0.0008, HA p = 0.0190). Odds of post-operative complications was 10.3 times higher in HA than IM (95% confidence interval 1.8 to 60.3). Future revision procedures were not found to be statistically significant between AORIF and IM (p = 0.234).

CONCLUSIONS

A minimally invasive interventional skeletal procedure for focal femoral head and neck osteolytic lesions may serve as an effective alternative treatment to traditional surgical approaches, conferring a shorter recovery time and fewer medical complications.