DOI 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.11.013
Systemic corticosteroid as an adjunctive treatment for lower respiratory tract infection in children with severe motor and intellectual disabilities.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Children with severe motor and intellectual disabilities (SMID) are susceptible to severe lower respiratory tract infection (LTRI). As SMID patients are prone to develop recurrent wheezing and are often diagnosed with bronchial asthma, they frequently receive systemic corticosteroids as an adjunctive treatment for LRTIs. However, the efficacy of corticosteroid therapy for LTRIs in SMID children is unclear. We investigated whether or not corticosteroid therapy was associated with better clinical outcomes for SMID children with LRTIs.
METHODS
Our retrospective study enrolled 217 SMID children 1-15 years old hospitalized for LTRIs. We compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes between patients with and without corticosteroid therapy.
RESULTS
Of the 217 patients, 29 (13.3%) received corticosteroid therapy. The proportion of patients with a history of bronchial asthma was higher and LRTI was more severe in patients with corticosteroid therapy than in those without the therapy. The length of hospital stay (LOHS) was significantly longer in patients with corticosteroid therapy (median 13 days) than in those without corticosteroid therapy (median 9 days) (P = 0.02). The same tendency was shown for the LOHS in patients with severe or moderate LRTI, although not to a significant extent.
CONCLUSION
Systemic corticosteroid therapy was not associated with better clinical outcomes in SMID children with LRTIs, even if the patients suffer from severe LRTIs. Corticosteroids should be used cautiously for LRTIs in SMID children because bronchial asthma is likely to be overdiagnosed in these children.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.