MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/jama.2026.0076

Медицинская библиотека · JAMA · 2026

Treatment for Brain Metastases With Stereotactic Radiation vs Hippocampal-Avoidance Whole Brain Radiation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Aizer Ayal A, Shin Kee-Young, Catalano Paul J, Ricca Ivy, Johnson Marciana, Benham Grant, Roper Kristin, Spicer Beverly, Mann Eileen, Nosker Jennifer, Parsons Michael W, Mendu Mallika L, Hepel Jaroslaw, Chipidza Fallon, Krishnan Monica, Shi Diana D, Lamba Nayan, Pashtan Itai, Peng Luke, Alexander Brian, Brown Paul D, Wen Patrick Y, Haas-Kogan Daphne A, Rahman Rifaquat, Tanguturi Shyam

Клиническое исследование III фазыСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

IMPORTANCE

Brain metastases are common in patients with cancer, and radiation is often used for management. Among patients with more than 4 brain metastases, the effects of stereotactic radiation targeting only individual tumors, compared with whole brain radiation with hippocampal avoidance, which radiates both tumors and normal brain, remain unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether stereotactic radiation improves symptom severity and interference with daily functioning, compared with whole brain radiation with hippocampal avoidance.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND

PARTICIPANTS

Phase 3, open-label, randomized clinical trial conducted at 4 United States-based centers. Eligible patients had 5 to 20 brain metastases and no prior brain-directed radiation. Enrollment occurred between April 11, 2017, and May 17, 2024 (final follow-up, March 18, 2025).

INTERVENTION: Stereotactic radiation, compared with whole brain radiation with hippocampal avoidance.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Mean weighted patient-reported symptom severity and interference score change over 6 months postbaseline relative to baseline using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor instrument (scale, 0-10; score change range, -10 to 10; -10 = best). A clinically meaningful Δ was defined as 0.98.

RESULTS

Of 196 randomized patients (mean age, 61 years; 129 [66%] female; 176 [90%] White; median number of brain metastases, 14 [IQR, 11-18]; 49 [25%] with prior neurosurgical resection), 83 (42%) completed the 6-month assessment. For the primary outcome, between baseline and postbaseline assessments through the 6-month follow-up, stereotactic radiation changed the weighted composite MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor score from 2.69 to 2.37 (mean change, -0.32) and hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiation changed the score from 2.29 to 3.03 (mean change, 0.74) (mean difference, -1.06 [95% CI, -1.54 to -0.58]; P < .001). Related grade 3-5 adverse events occurred in 12 patients (12%) in the stereotactic radiation group and 13 patients (13%) in the hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiation group; grade 1-3 fatigue was most frequent (27 [28%] vs 43 [44%], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In patients with 5 to 20 brain metastases, these findings support stereotactic radiation over hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiation to improve symptoms and interference with daily functioning, key components of quality of life.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03075072.

Для цитирования: Aizer Ayal A, Shin Kee-Young, Catalano Paul J, Ricca Ivy, Johnson Marciana, Benham Grant, Roper Kristin, Spicer Beverly, Mann Eileen, Nosker Jennifer, Parsons Michael W, Mendu Mallika L, Hepel Jaroslaw, Chipidza Fallon, Krishnan Monica, Shi Diana D, Lamba Nayan, Pashtan Itai, Peng Luke, Alexander Brian, Brown Paul D, Wen Patrick Y, Haas-Kogan Daphne A, Rahman Rifaquat, Tanguturi Shyam. Treatment for Brain Metastases With Stereotactic Radiation vs Hippocampal-Avoidance Whole Brain Radiation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.. JAMA. 2026. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2026.0076.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.