Journal of pediatric surgery · 2015
Postoperative outcome and survival in relation to small intestinal involvement of total colonic aganglionosis.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hukkinen Maria, Koivusalo Antti, Merras-Salmio Laura, Rintala Risto J, Pakarinen Mikko P
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The prognosis and treatment of total colonic aganglionosis (TCA) vary according to the presence and extent of small bowel involvement.
METHODS: Medical records of TCA patients treated in Helsinki University Children's Hospital during 1984-2013 (n=21) were reviewed.
RESULTS: The aganglionosis extended up to cecum or distal ileum (n=12), mid small bowel (n=4), or duodenojejunal flexure (n=5). Patients underwent resection of distal aganglionic bowel with ileoanal (IAA) or jejunoanal anastomosis (JAA) with (n=9) or without J-pouch (n=5), Lester-Martin pull-through (n=1), or were left with an end-jejunostomy (n=6). Further procedures included autologous intestinal reconstruction (n=3) and ITx/listing for ITx (n=2). Compared to distal ileum aganglionosis, patients with more proximal disease required parenteral nutrition (PN) more often (100% vs. 25%) and weaned off PN less frequently (p=0.001). At last follow-up 6.5 (interquartile range 2.5-14.5) years postoperatively, all patients with distal ileum aganglionosis were off PN and alive compared to 78% on PN (p<0.001) and 67% alive (p=0.063) of those with more proximal disease. All had normal plasma bilirubin and patients with preserved intestinal continuity (n=13) were continent.
CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes following restorative proctocolectomy for aganglionosis extending up to mid small bowel are promising, whereas long-term outlook in proximal small intestinal disease is dismal without ITx.
METHODS: Medical records of TCA patients treated in Helsinki University Children's Hospital during 1984-2013 (n=21) were reviewed.
RESULTS: The aganglionosis extended up to cecum or distal ileum (n=12), mid small bowel (n=4), or duodenojejunal flexure (n=5). Patients underwent resection of distal aganglionic bowel with ileoanal (IAA) or jejunoanal anastomosis (JAA) with (n=9) or without J-pouch (n=5), Lester-Martin pull-through (n=1), or were left with an end-jejunostomy (n=6). Further procedures included autologous intestinal reconstruction (n=3) and ITx/listing for ITx (n=2). Compared to distal ileum aganglionosis, patients with more proximal disease required parenteral nutrition (PN) more often (100% vs. 25%) and weaned off PN less frequently (p=0.001). At last follow-up 6.5 (interquartile range 2.5-14.5) years postoperatively, all patients with distal ileum aganglionosis were off PN and alive compared to 78% on PN (p<0.001) and 67% alive (p=0.063) of those with more proximal disease. All had normal plasma bilirubin and patients with preserved intestinal continuity (n=13) were continent.
CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes following restorative proctocolectomy for aganglionosis extending up to mid small bowel are promising, whereas long-term outlook in proximal small intestinal disease is dismal without ITx.