The Journal of pediatrics · 2020
Predictive Value of the Global School Adaptation Questionnaire at 5 Years of Age and Educational Support at 7 Years of Age in Very Preterm Children.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Muller Jean-Baptiste, Olivier Marion, Guimard Philippe, Gascoin Géraldine, Roze Jean-Christophe, Flamant Cyril, Roy Arnaud
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the Global School Adaptation (GSA) questionnaire of children's abilities and classroom behavior administered to teachers of very preterm children at 5 years of age as a predictor of the need for educational support (grade retention, special class, learning support) at age 7.
STUDY DESIGN: We assessed 858 very preterm children (<33 weeks of gestation) at 5 years of age using the GSA and again at 7 years to determine the use of educational support. We examined the association between the GSA score and educational support at 7 years and performed a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
RESULTS: At 7 years of age, 130 children had educational support (15.2%). Children with a nonoptimal GSA score (<45) at 5 years required educational support more often (57.7%) than children with a GSA score of 45 or greater (15.4%) (OR, 7.5; 95% CI, 5.02-11.21). The need for educational support was associated with male sex; a low parent socioeconomic level; lower birth weight, birth head circumference, or gestational age (28-30 weeks of gestation); severe neurologic complications; patent ductus arteriosus ligation; and the use of therapy services at 5 years of age. After adjustment, only the GSA score was associated with educational support at 7 years of age (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.84-0.88). A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the GSA performance revealed an optimal cut-off at 48, with a sensitivity of 70.8%, a specificity of 73.5%, and an area under the curve of 0.79.
CONCLUSIONS: Using a cut-off score of 48, the GSA at 5 years of age may be a useful tool to identify children born preterm at risk of school-based learning difficulties.
STUDY DESIGN: We assessed 858 very preterm children (<33 weeks of gestation) at 5 years of age using the GSA and again at 7 years to determine the use of educational support. We examined the association between the GSA score and educational support at 7 years and performed a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
RESULTS: At 7 years of age, 130 children had educational support (15.2%). Children with a nonoptimal GSA score (<45) at 5 years required educational support more often (57.7%) than children with a GSA score of 45 or greater (15.4%) (OR, 7.5; 95% CI, 5.02-11.21). The need for educational support was associated with male sex; a low parent socioeconomic level; lower birth weight, birth head circumference, or gestational age (28-30 weeks of gestation); severe neurologic complications; patent ductus arteriosus ligation; and the use of therapy services at 5 years of age. After adjustment, only the GSA score was associated with educational support at 7 years of age (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.84-0.88). A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the GSA performance revealed an optimal cut-off at 48, with a sensitivity of 70.8%, a specificity of 73.5%, and an area under the curve of 0.79.
CONCLUSIONS: Using a cut-off score of 48, the GSA at 5 years of age may be a useful tool to identify children born preterm at risk of school-based learning difficulties.