The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2020
Establishment of a multidisciplinary fetal center streamlines approach for congenital lung malformations.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Reyna Juan C, Zagory Jessica A, Yallapragada Sushmita, Santiago-Munoz Patricia, Schindel David T
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Fetuses with a diagnosis of congenital lung malformations (CLM) on prenatal imaging are commonly referred to a multi-disciplinary specialty team for prenatal assessment and postnatal management. The net effect of such services is broadly stated to improve the outcomes of affected newborns. However, these claims are relatively unsubstantiated.
METHODS: After IRB approval, a retrospective review of children diagnosed with CLM from 2008 to 2018 and referred to a large urban children's hospital was performed. A comparison was performed between prenatally diagnosed patients having a multi-disciplinary fetal center evaluation (FC) and prenatally diagnosed patients who did not receive a referral or were seen prior to the establishment of the center (NON-FC).
RESULTS: Eighty-eight live-born patients with a prenatal diagnosis of CLM were identified, with 49 in the FC group and 39 NON-FC. Thirty-four (63%) and 23 (59%) patients underwent operative resection of CLM, respectively. FC patients presented earlier at first postnatal follow-up (42 vs. 145 days, p = .03), had fewer preoperative office visits (2.1 vs. 3.4, p = .0003), received fewer preoperative chest radiographs (0.5 vs. 1.3; p = .002) and chest computed tomography (0.9 vs. 1.4; p = .001), and had fewer preoperative pneumonias (0 vs. 17.4%; p = .02) compared to their NON-FC counterparts. FC patients were also more likely to undergo resection at an earlier age (217 vs. 481 days, p = .003) and were more likely to undergo a minimally invasive resection (75% vs. 39.1%, p = .015). There were no differences in post-operative outcomes between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Children with a prenatal diagnosis of CLM appear to benefit from an organized multi-specialty team approach in several impactful parameters. Hospital systems and providers that invest in similar strategies are likely to achieve improved outcomes in the care of newborns prenatally diagnosed with a CLM.
METHODS: After IRB approval, a retrospective review of children diagnosed with CLM from 2008 to 2018 and referred to a large urban children's hospital was performed. A comparison was performed between prenatally diagnosed patients having a multi-disciplinary fetal center evaluation (FC) and prenatally diagnosed patients who did not receive a referral or were seen prior to the establishment of the center (NON-FC).
RESULTS: Eighty-eight live-born patients with a prenatal diagnosis of CLM were identified, with 49 in the FC group and 39 NON-FC. Thirty-four (63%) and 23 (59%) patients underwent operative resection of CLM, respectively. FC patients presented earlier at first postnatal follow-up (42 vs. 145 days, p = .03), had fewer preoperative office visits (2.1 vs. 3.4, p = .0003), received fewer preoperative chest radiographs (0.5 vs. 1.3; p = .002) and chest computed tomography (0.9 vs. 1.4; p = .001), and had fewer preoperative pneumonias (0 vs. 17.4%; p = .02) compared to their NON-FC counterparts. FC patients were also more likely to undergo resection at an earlier age (217 vs. 481 days, p = .003) and were more likely to undergo a minimally invasive resection (75% vs. 39.1%, p = .015). There were no differences in post-operative outcomes between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Children with a prenatal diagnosis of CLM appear to benefit from an organized multi-specialty team approach in several impactful parameters. Hospital systems and providers that invest in similar strategies are likely to achieve improved outcomes in the care of newborns prenatally diagnosed with a CLM.