Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2019
Multiple administrations of fluconazole increase plasma exposure to ruxolitinib in healthy adult subjects.
Клиническое исследование I фазыСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Aslanis Vassilios, Umehara Kenichi, Huth Felix, Ouatas Taoufik, Bharathy Savita, Butler Andrew Avigdor, Zhou Wen, Gadbaw Brian
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Ruxolitinib is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 and CYP2C9. Dual inhibitors of these enzymes (like fluconazole) lead to increased ruxolitinib exposure relative to a single pathway inhibition of CYP3A4 or CYP2C9. The magnitude of this interaction, previously assessed via physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models, was confirmed in an open-label, phase 1 study in healthy subjects.
METHODS: The effect of multiple doses (200 mg) of fluconazole on single-dose (10 mg) PK of ruxolitinib was investigated including evaluation of the safety and tolerability. The PK parameters of ruxolitinib alone (reference) were compared to those of ruxolitinib combined with fluconazole (test). The point estimate and corresponding two-sided 90% confidence interval for the difference between means of test and reference parameters were determined.
RESULTS: All enrolled subjects (N = 15) completed the study. When coadministered with fluconazole, geometric means of ruxolitinib PK parameters Cmax, AUClast, and AUCinf increased by 47%, 234%, and 232%, respectively, vs ruxolitinib alone. The median Tmax decreased slightly, apparent clearance decreased approximately threefold, and elimination half-life increased approximately 2.5-fold, upon ruxolitinib administration with fluconazole vs ruxolitinib alone. These results were consistent with the prospective predictions from a SimCYP PBPK model. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in six subjects (none were suspected to be related to ruxolitinib); no death or on-treatment serious AE was reported.
CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of ruxolitinib with fluconazole significantly increased ruxolitinib systemic exposure; however, no AEs were attributed to ruxolitinib. Concomitant use of ruxolitinib with fluconazole (dose ≤ 200 mg) may require dose reduction/modification of ruxolitinib.
METHODS: The effect of multiple doses (200 mg) of fluconazole on single-dose (10 mg) PK of ruxolitinib was investigated including evaluation of the safety and tolerability. The PK parameters of ruxolitinib alone (reference) were compared to those of ruxolitinib combined with fluconazole (test). The point estimate and corresponding two-sided 90% confidence interval for the difference between means of test and reference parameters were determined.
RESULTS: All enrolled subjects (N = 15) completed the study. When coadministered with fluconazole, geometric means of ruxolitinib PK parameters Cmax, AUClast, and AUCinf increased by 47%, 234%, and 232%, respectively, vs ruxolitinib alone. The median Tmax decreased slightly, apparent clearance decreased approximately threefold, and elimination half-life increased approximately 2.5-fold, upon ruxolitinib administration with fluconazole vs ruxolitinib alone. These results were consistent with the prospective predictions from a SimCYP PBPK model. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in six subjects (none were suspected to be related to ruxolitinib); no death or on-treatment serious AE was reported.
CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of ruxolitinib with fluconazole significantly increased ruxolitinib systemic exposure; however, no AEs were attributed to ruxolitinib. Concomitant use of ruxolitinib with fluconazole (dose ≤ 200 mg) may require dose reduction/modification of ruxolitinib.