Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation · 2009
BIS response to tamponade and dobutamine in swine varies with hypnotic/opiate ratio.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Beydon L, Desfontis J C, Ganster F, Petres J, Gautier F, Ferec S, Cailleux A, Dussaussoy C, Liu N, Chazot T, Fischler M, Gogny M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This study in swine assessed BIS stability in response to decreases and increases in cardiac output under two propofol/remifentanil dosage combinations, both producing the same depth of surgical anaesthesia.
METHODS: Eight anaesthetized-paralyzed ventilated adult swine were studied using a random-order cross-over design. Four received a P low/R high combination (P, 8.4+/-0.9 mg/kg/h; and R, 0.54+/-0.02 microg/kg/min) and then a P high/R low combination (P, 26.7+/-2.1mg/kg/h; and R, 0.34+/-0.01 microg/kg/min). The other four had these two combinations in the reverse order. Under each P/R combination, and after a 60-minutes steady state, a 15-minute stable cardiac tamponade was induced by intrapericardial gelatine infusion. Then, after returning to pre tamponade condition, a 15 minutes period with dobutamine was allowed.
RESULTS: Tamponade induced falls in average mean arterial pressure (MAP) (from 79+/-18 to 47+/-9 mm Hg; p<0.05) and cardiac output (Qc) (from 1.90+/-0.46 l/min to 1.20+/-0.38 l/min, p<0.05). Conversely, dobutamine increased both MAP and Qc (p<0.05). During each type of hemodynamic challenges, changes in anaesthesia depth as assessed by BIS differed dramatically between the two drug combinations, despite observing the same percent change in P and R effect-site concentration. With P high/R low and tamponade, BIS fell from 65+/-5 to 29+/-10 (p<0.05); dobutamine produced opposite effects. With P low/R high, in contrast, BIS was not influenced by either of the hemodynamic challenges.
CONCLUSION: Conversely to a high propofol/low remifentanil combination, a low propofol/high remifentanil combination allows constant anaesthetic depth in the face of haemodynamic challenges.
METHODS: Eight anaesthetized-paralyzed ventilated adult swine were studied using a random-order cross-over design. Four received a P low/R high combination (P, 8.4+/-0.9 mg/kg/h; and R, 0.54+/-0.02 microg/kg/min) and then a P high/R low combination (P, 26.7+/-2.1mg/kg/h; and R, 0.34+/-0.01 microg/kg/min). The other four had these two combinations in the reverse order. Under each P/R combination, and after a 60-minutes steady state, a 15-minute stable cardiac tamponade was induced by intrapericardial gelatine infusion. Then, after returning to pre tamponade condition, a 15 minutes period with dobutamine was allowed.
RESULTS: Tamponade induced falls in average mean arterial pressure (MAP) (from 79+/-18 to 47+/-9 mm Hg; p<0.05) and cardiac output (Qc) (from 1.90+/-0.46 l/min to 1.20+/-0.38 l/min, p<0.05). Conversely, dobutamine increased both MAP and Qc (p<0.05). During each type of hemodynamic challenges, changes in anaesthesia depth as assessed by BIS differed dramatically between the two drug combinations, despite observing the same percent change in P and R effect-site concentration. With P high/R low and tamponade, BIS fell from 65+/-5 to 29+/-10 (p<0.05); dobutamine produced opposite effects. With P low/R high, in contrast, BIS was not influenced by either of the hemodynamic challenges.
CONCLUSION: Conversely to a high propofol/low remifentanil combination, a low propofol/high remifentanil combination allows constant anaesthetic depth in the face of haemodynamic challenges.