Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2024
Nanoparticle Polymeric Micellar Paclitaxel Versus Paclitaxel for Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Fei-Yu, Huang Xiang-Ming, Cao Yu-Qing, Cao Jie, Ni Jie, Li Ke, Lu Min, Huang Xin-En
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Nanoparticle polymeric micellar paclitaxel (NPMP) is a novel Cremophor EL (CrEL)-free nanoparticle micellar formulation of paclitaxel. This study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of NPMP in the treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).
METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed AGC in Jiangsu Cancer Hospital were retrospectively collected and divided into two groups. Patients in group A received NPMP at a total dose of 360 mg/m2 each cycle, and patients in group B were given paclitaxel at a dose of 210 mg/m2 each cycle. In addition, all patients received 5-fluorouracil at a dose of 0.75 g/m2 on days 1-4 and leucovorin at a dose of 200 mg/m2 on days 1-4 for at least 2 cycles.
RESULTS: From January 2021 to May 2023, 63 patients (32 in group A and 31 in group B) could be evaluated for treatment response. A marked disparity in the overall response was observed between groups A and B, indicating statistical significance. The overall response rate was 31% in group A (10/32) and 10% in group B (3/31) (P = 0.034). Disease control rate was 91% in group A (29/32) and 81% in group B (25/31) (P = 0.440). No statistically significant difference in adverse reactions was observed between the two groups. However, the incidence of anemia, leucopenia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, liver dysfunction, and allergy in group A was notably lower than that in group B.
CONCLUSIONS: NPMP combined chemotherapy offers a new, active, and safe treatment for patients with AGC.
METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed AGC in Jiangsu Cancer Hospital were retrospectively collected and divided into two groups. Patients in group A received NPMP at a total dose of 360 mg/m2 each cycle, and patients in group B were given paclitaxel at a dose of 210 mg/m2 each cycle. In addition, all patients received 5-fluorouracil at a dose of 0.75 g/m2 on days 1-4 and leucovorin at a dose of 200 mg/m2 on days 1-4 for at least 2 cycles.
RESULTS: From January 2021 to May 2023, 63 patients (32 in group A and 31 in group B) could be evaluated for treatment response. A marked disparity in the overall response was observed between groups A and B, indicating statistical significance. The overall response rate was 31% in group A (10/32) and 10% in group B (3/31) (P = 0.034). Disease control rate was 91% in group A (29/32) and 81% in group B (25/31) (P = 0.440). No statistically significant difference in adverse reactions was observed between the two groups. However, the incidence of anemia, leucopenia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, liver dysfunction, and allergy in group A was notably lower than that in group B.
CONCLUSIONS: NPMP combined chemotherapy offers a new, active, and safe treatment for patients with AGC.