Sleep medicine · 2021
Diagnostic value of actigraphy in hypersomnolence disorders.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Torstensen Eva Wiberg, Pickering Line, Kornum Birgitte Rahbek, Wanscher Benedikte, Baandrup Lone, Jennum Poul Jørgen
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Differentiating between the central hypersomnias presents a challenge to the diagnosis of patients with hypersomnolence. Actitigraphy may support efforts to distinguish them. We aimed to evaluate: 1) the ability of actigraphy to quantify sleep continuity measures in comparison with polysomnography in patients with hypersomnolence; 2) whether actigraphy can distinguish patients with hypersomnolence with normal hypocretin-1 in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with narcolepsy type 1 and from sleep-healthy controls; and 3) the distinct activity profiles and circadian rhythms of patients with narcolepsy type 1, patients with hypersomnolence with normal hypocretin-1 in cerebrospinal fluid, and sleep-healthy controls.
METHOD: Polysomnography, multiple sleep latency tests and actigraphy were conducted in 14 patients with narcolepsy type 1, 29 patients with hypersomnolence with normal hypocretin-1 in cerebrospinal fluid and 15 sleep-healthy controls.
RESULTS: Actigraphy quantified several sleep continuity measures consistently with polysomnography in all the patients. Actigraphy distinguished patients with hypersomnolence with normal hypocretin-1 in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with narcolepsy type 1 and sleep-healthy controls. Patients with narcolepsy type 1 had poor sleep quality and altered circadian rest-activity rhythm compared with controls.
CONCLUSION: Actigraphy is an adequate tool for establishing the amount of night sleep and supports the differential diagnosis of patients with hypersomnolence.
METHOD: Polysomnography, multiple sleep latency tests and actigraphy were conducted in 14 patients with narcolepsy type 1, 29 patients with hypersomnolence with normal hypocretin-1 in cerebrospinal fluid and 15 sleep-healthy controls.
RESULTS: Actigraphy quantified several sleep continuity measures consistently with polysomnography in all the patients. Actigraphy distinguished patients with hypersomnolence with normal hypocretin-1 in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with narcolepsy type 1 and sleep-healthy controls. Patients with narcolepsy type 1 had poor sleep quality and altered circadian rest-activity rhythm compared with controls.
CONCLUSION: Actigraphy is an adequate tool for establishing the amount of night sleep and supports the differential diagnosis of patients with hypersomnolence.