MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0190-9622(96)90494-6

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 1996

False-positive polymerase chain reaction results for human papillomavirus in lichen planus. Potential laboratory pitfalls of this procedure.

Boyd A S, Annarella M, Rapini R P, Adler-Storthz K, Duvic M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a common tool in laboratory evaluation of tissue samples. It has been particularly useful in testing for nucleic acids of infectious organisms implicated in the pathogenesis of cutaneous diseases.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to evaluate archival biopsy material (paraffin-embedded) of lichen planus for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA with PCR and in situ hybridization (ISH).

METHODS

Tissue sections were obtained from 13 specimens of lichen planus and 10 control tissues. Standard methods for PCR and ISH were used to evaluate the presence of HPV DNA. RESULTS. Initial PCR results demonstrated HPV DNA in 11 of 13 specimens and in none of the control tissue. However, testing for specific HPV types revealed nucleic acid contamination. ISH was negative in all specimens.

CONCLUSION

Accurate evaluation of tissue with PCR is difficult because of the procedure's profound sensitivity. Positive results reported in the literature should be viewed with caution. Potential causes for false-positive and false-negative results should be considered.

Для цитирования: Boyd A S, Annarella M, Rapini R P, Adler-Storthz K, Duvic M. False-positive polymerase chain reaction results for human papillomavirus in lichen planus. Potential laboratory pitfalls of this procedure.. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 1996. DOI: 10.1016/s0190-9622(96)90494-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.