Journal of affective disorders · 2024
Discriminative analysis of schizophrenia and major depressive disorder using fNIRS.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Diao Yunheng, Wang Huiying, Wang Xinyu, Qiu Chen, Wang Zitian, Ji Ziyang, Wang Chao, Gu Jingyang, Liu Cong, Wu Kai, Wang Changhong
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Research into the shared and distinct brain dysfunctions in patients with schizophrenia (SCZ) and major depressive disorder (MDD) has been increasing. However, few studies have explored the application of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) in investigating brain dysfunction and enhancing diagnostic methodologies in these two conditions.
METHODS: A general linear model was used for analysis of brain activation following task-state fNIRS from 131 patients with SCZ, 132 patients with MDD and 130 healthy controls (HCs). Subsequently, seventy-seven time-frequency analysis methods were used to construct new features of fNIRS, followed by the implementation of five machine learning algorithms to develop a differential diagnosis model for the three groups. This model was evaluated by comparing it to both a diagnostic model relying on traditional fNIRS features and assessments made by two psychiatrists.
RESULTS: Brain activation analysis revealed significantly lower activation in Broca's area, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and the middle temporal gyrus for both the SCZ and MDD groups compared to HCs. Additionally, the SCZ group exhibited notably lower activation in the superior temporal gyrus and the subcentral gyrus compared to the MDD group. When distinguishing among the three groups using independent validation datasets, the models utilizing new fNIRS features achieved an accuracy of 85.90 % (AUC = 0.95). In contrast, models based on traditional fNIRS features reached an accuracy of 52.56 % (AUC = 0.66). The accuracies of the two psychiatrists were 42.00 % (AUC = 0.60) and 38.00 % (AUC = 0.50), respectively.
CONCLUSION: This investigation brings to light the shared and distinct neurobiological abnormalities present in SCZ and MDD, offering potential enhancements for extant diagnostic systems.
METHODS: A general linear model was used for analysis of brain activation following task-state fNIRS from 131 patients with SCZ, 132 patients with MDD and 130 healthy controls (HCs). Subsequently, seventy-seven time-frequency analysis methods were used to construct new features of fNIRS, followed by the implementation of five machine learning algorithms to develop a differential diagnosis model for the three groups. This model was evaluated by comparing it to both a diagnostic model relying on traditional fNIRS features and assessments made by two psychiatrists.
RESULTS: Brain activation analysis revealed significantly lower activation in Broca's area, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and the middle temporal gyrus for both the SCZ and MDD groups compared to HCs. Additionally, the SCZ group exhibited notably lower activation in the superior temporal gyrus and the subcentral gyrus compared to the MDD group. When distinguishing among the three groups using independent validation datasets, the models utilizing new fNIRS features achieved an accuracy of 85.90 % (AUC = 0.95). In contrast, models based on traditional fNIRS features reached an accuracy of 52.56 % (AUC = 0.66). The accuracies of the two psychiatrists were 42.00 % (AUC = 0.60) and 38.00 % (AUC = 0.50), respectively.
CONCLUSION: This investigation brings to light the shared and distinct neurobiological abnormalities present in SCZ and MDD, offering potential enhancements for extant diagnostic systems.