Current opinion in cardiology · 2025
Near infrared spectroscopy in the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit: accurately interpreting the data.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Iliopoulos Ilias, Flores Saul, Loomba Rohit
Аннотация
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) has been increasingly adopted as standard monitoring in postoperative care of pediatric cardiac patients. Several reports have established its association with both markers of perfusion and adverse outcomes. The correlation with markers of perfusion is not strong and exhibits wide limit of agreement, making the determination of critical thresholds and its integration in treatment algorithms challenging.
RECENT FINDINGS: A growing body of literature support the use of NIRS for hemodynamic monitoring in pediatric cardiac patients. Recent reports corroborate prior findings of weak to moderate correlation of NIRS with markers of global and regional perfusion and confirm its association with adverse outcomes. The challenge of lack of treatment thresholds remains, limiting clinical utility. Evidence of improvement of outcomes with the use of NIRS remains limited.
SUMMARY: NIRS is a useful monitor of regional and global perfusion and can inform management decisions but cannot be used as the sole decision-making tool. Large, randomized studies are needed to define its use as decision making tool and facilitate its integration in treatment algorithms.
RECENT FINDINGS: A growing body of literature support the use of NIRS for hemodynamic monitoring in pediatric cardiac patients. Recent reports corroborate prior findings of weak to moderate correlation of NIRS with markers of global and regional perfusion and confirm its association with adverse outcomes. The challenge of lack of treatment thresholds remains, limiting clinical utility. Evidence of improvement of outcomes with the use of NIRS remains limited.
SUMMARY: NIRS is a useful monitor of regional and global perfusion and can inform management decisions but cannot be used as the sole decision-making tool. Large, randomized studies are needed to define its use as decision making tool and facilitate its integration in treatment algorithms.