Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care · 1992
A model for quality assessment in cervical cytology used as a screening test.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Quantin C, Dusserre L, Montaud A M, Mottot C, Feldman J P
Аннотация
Although many reliability studies on cervical cytology have been carried out, measurements of sensitivity and specificity have rarely been made since biopsies are not often performed on patients with a negative smear result. This screening assessment was performed over 3 years, using a database of 230,167 smears from 177,051 women. It would seem that cervical cytology has a high specificity (over 99%) but a relatively low sensitivity (61%). Values for sensitivity (exceeding 95%) and specificity (exceeding 99%) for invasive carcinoma should be regarded as reasonably accurate as all incident cases of symptomatic cervical carcinoma are recorded in the Burgundy register. The sensitivity (57%) for pre-invasive lesions is underestimated while their prevalence is overestimated: the lack of organized screening leads to the loss of prevalent cases. The predictive value of a positive smear is 76% for moderate-severe dysplasia, 85% for in situ carcinoma and over 95% for invasive carcinoma.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyCarcinoma in SituChildCondylomata AcuminataDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleHumansMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalOutcome Assessment, Health CarePredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and SpecificityUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaginal Smears