Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology · 2026
Current Practices in the Use of Anti-Mullerian Hormone for Surveillance of Ovarian Function in Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Report from the Pediatric and Adolescent Committee of the Oncofertility Consortium.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bjornard Kari, Close Allison, Rios Julie, Anazodo Antoinette, Levine Jennifer, Yu Christine, Nahata Leena, Meacham Lillian
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) is a surrogate measure to assess ovarian reserve in childhood cancer survivors, but consensus is lacking on when to obtain and how to use AMH data.
METHODS: Pediatric and adolescent committee (PAC) members of the Oncofertility Consortium were invited by email to complete a survey regarding ovarian reserve surveillance and their use of AMH. Responses were collected through REDCap, and results were stratified by specialty: pediatric oncology and endocrinology (PED) or adult/pediatric gynecology and reproductive endocrinology (GYN). Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact tests were used for analysis using SAS v9.4.
RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 48 of 123 eligible PAC members (28 PED, 19 GYN, response rate 39%). The majority (83.3%) reported using AMH as a measure of ovarian reserve, with the earliest timepoint to begin AMH surveillance to be 12-23 months from therapy completion (63%). While most respondents felt the benefits of testing outweighed the limitations (78.7%), commonly reported limitations included variability of results (60.4%) and lack of standardization in use of AMH (52.1%). Differences between PED and GYN respondents included how AMH was used among their clinical practice and the timing of laboratory evaluation.
CONCLUSIONS: Most respondents indicated they used AMH; however, practices in its application varied depending on specialty backgrounds. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines would improve the standardization of surveillance and counseling and prevent missed opportunities for fertility preservation in survivorship.
METHODS: Pediatric and adolescent committee (PAC) members of the Oncofertility Consortium were invited by email to complete a survey regarding ovarian reserve surveillance and their use of AMH. Responses were collected through REDCap, and results were stratified by specialty: pediatric oncology and endocrinology (PED) or adult/pediatric gynecology and reproductive endocrinology (GYN). Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact tests were used for analysis using SAS v9.4.
RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 48 of 123 eligible PAC members (28 PED, 19 GYN, response rate 39%). The majority (83.3%) reported using AMH as a measure of ovarian reserve, with the earliest timepoint to begin AMH surveillance to be 12-23 months from therapy completion (63%). While most respondents felt the benefits of testing outweighed the limitations (78.7%), commonly reported limitations included variability of results (60.4%) and lack of standardization in use of AMH (52.1%). Differences between PED and GYN respondents included how AMH was used among their clinical practice and the timing of laboratory evaluation.
CONCLUSIONS: Most respondents indicated they used AMH; however, practices in its application varied depending on specialty backgrounds. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines would improve the standardization of surveillance and counseling and prevent missed opportunities for fertility preservation in survivorship.