The Journal of urology · 2002
Testicular growth arrest and adolescent varicocele: does varicocele size make a difference?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Thomas John C, Elder Jack S
Аннотация
PURPOSE: We assessed whether testicular growth arrest is related to varicocele size in adolescents. We also determined whether adolescents with a varicocele and testes of equal size treated nonoperatively are at significant risk for growth arrest and, if so, whether this risk is related to varicocele size.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of boys with a varicocele. Testis volume was measured with calipers and computed into cc as (length x width x breadth) x 0.521. Testicular growth arrest was defined as left testis at least 15% smaller than the right testis. Varicocele size was graded 1-barely palpable, 2-palpable but not visible, 3a-visible and, 1 to 1.5 times the size of the ipsilateral testis, 3b-1.5 to 2 times the size of the ipsilateral testis and 3c-greater than 2 times the size of the ipsilateral testis. Boys with a grade 1 varicocele and those treated with previous inguinal or testicular surgery were excluded from study. Repair was recommended for testicular growth arrest or discomfort. Data were analyzed with chi-square and Fisher's exact test.
RESULTS: The records of 124 boys 7 to 18 years old (mean age 13) with a varicocele were reviewed. Seven patients were excluded from analysis, yielding a total of 117 boys. Testicular growth arrest was observed at initial visit in 10 of 33 (30.3%) grade 2, 18 of 37 (48.6%) grade 3a, 14 of 31 (45.2%) grade 3b and 6 of 16 (37.5%) grade 3c cases (p not significant), or a total of 38 of 84 (45.2%) grade 3 cases (p <0.01) plus grade 2. Followup ranged from 1 to 5 years. Of the cases of equal sized testes at presentation growth arrest was observed in 3 of 16 (18.8%) grade 2, 2 of 11 (18.2%) grade 3a, 4 of 14 (28.6%) grade 3b and 3 of 9 (33.3%) grade 3c (p not significant), or a total of 9 of 34 (26.5%) grade 3 cases (p not significant) plus grade 2. Overall, testicular growth arrest was found in 13 of 33 (39%) grade 2 and 47 of 84 (56%) grade 3 varicoceles (p <0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Boys with a varicocele are at significant risk for testicular growth arrest, irrespective of varicocele size, and those with a grade 3 varicocele have a higher risk of testicular growth arrest than those with a grade 2 varicocele. Of boys with testes of equal size at diagnosis growth arrest is observed during adolescence in approximately 25% irrespective of varicocele size.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of boys with a varicocele. Testis volume was measured with calipers and computed into cc as (length x width x breadth) x 0.521. Testicular growth arrest was defined as left testis at least 15% smaller than the right testis. Varicocele size was graded 1-barely palpable, 2-palpable but not visible, 3a-visible and, 1 to 1.5 times the size of the ipsilateral testis, 3b-1.5 to 2 times the size of the ipsilateral testis and 3c-greater than 2 times the size of the ipsilateral testis. Boys with a grade 1 varicocele and those treated with previous inguinal or testicular surgery were excluded from study. Repair was recommended for testicular growth arrest or discomfort. Data were analyzed with chi-square and Fisher's exact test.
RESULTS: The records of 124 boys 7 to 18 years old (mean age 13) with a varicocele were reviewed. Seven patients were excluded from analysis, yielding a total of 117 boys. Testicular growth arrest was observed at initial visit in 10 of 33 (30.3%) grade 2, 18 of 37 (48.6%) grade 3a, 14 of 31 (45.2%) grade 3b and 6 of 16 (37.5%) grade 3c cases (p not significant), or a total of 38 of 84 (45.2%) grade 3 cases (p <0.01) plus grade 2. Followup ranged from 1 to 5 years. Of the cases of equal sized testes at presentation growth arrest was observed in 3 of 16 (18.8%) grade 2, 2 of 11 (18.2%) grade 3a, 4 of 14 (28.6%) grade 3b and 3 of 9 (33.3%) grade 3c (p not significant), or a total of 9 of 34 (26.5%) grade 3 cases (p not significant) plus grade 2. Overall, testicular growth arrest was found in 13 of 33 (39%) grade 2 and 47 of 84 (56%) grade 3 varicoceles (p <0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Boys with a varicocele are at significant risk for testicular growth arrest, irrespective of varicocele size, and those with a grade 3 varicocele have a higher risk of testicular growth arrest than those with a grade 2 varicocele. Of boys with testes of equal size at diagnosis growth arrest is observed during adolescence in approximately 25% irrespective of varicocele size.