Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2022
Effect of renin-angiotensin system antihypertensive medication use on cognitive function in diabetes mellitus with obesity or overweight: An ancillary study to the Action for Health in Diabetes (Look AHEAD) trial.
Рандомизированное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wharton Whitney, Anderson Andrea, Hayden Kathleen M, Carmichael Owen T, Clark Jeanne M, Luchsinger José A, Espeland Mark, Yasar Sevil
Аннотация
AIM: To determine whether antihypertensive medication (AHM) acting through the renin angiotensin system (RAS-AHM), compared with other AHM, can mitigate effects on cognitive function and risk for impairment in a population with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This secondary analysis of the randomized controlled Action for Health in Diabetes (Look AHEAD) study included 712 community-dwelling participants who were followed over 15 years. Logistic regression was used to relate RAS-AHM use to cognitive impairment, and linear regression was used to relate RAS-AHM use to domain-specific cognitive function after adjusting for potential confounders.
RESULTS: A total of 563 individuals reported RAS-AHM use and 149 reported other-AHM use during the study. RAS-AHM users have college or higher education (53%), had higher baseline glycated haemoglobin (57 mmol/mol), and reported higher diabetes medication use (86%), while other-AHM users were more likely to be White (72%), obese (25%) and to have cardiovascular history (19%). RAS-AHM use was not associated with a reduced risk of dementia compared with other-AHM use. We did observe better executive function (Trail Making Test, part B, P < 0.04), processing speed (Digit Symbol Substitution Test, P < 0.004), verbal memory (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test-delayed recall, P < 0.005), and composite score (P < 0.008) among RAS-AHM users compared with other-AHM users.
CONCLUSION: In this sample of adults with T2DM, free of dementia at baseline, we observed a slower decline in processing speed, executive function, verbal memory, and composite score among RAS-AHM users.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This secondary analysis of the randomized controlled Action for Health in Diabetes (Look AHEAD) study included 712 community-dwelling participants who were followed over 15 years. Logistic regression was used to relate RAS-AHM use to cognitive impairment, and linear regression was used to relate RAS-AHM use to domain-specific cognitive function after adjusting for potential confounders.
RESULTS: A total of 563 individuals reported RAS-AHM use and 149 reported other-AHM use during the study. RAS-AHM users have college or higher education (53%), had higher baseline glycated haemoglobin (57 mmol/mol), and reported higher diabetes medication use (86%), while other-AHM users were more likely to be White (72%), obese (25%) and to have cardiovascular history (19%). RAS-AHM use was not associated with a reduced risk of dementia compared with other-AHM use. We did observe better executive function (Trail Making Test, part B, P < 0.04), processing speed (Digit Symbol Substitution Test, P < 0.004), verbal memory (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test-delayed recall, P < 0.005), and composite score (P < 0.008) among RAS-AHM users compared with other-AHM users.
CONCLUSION: In this sample of adults with T2DM, free of dementia at baseline, we observed a slower decline in processing speed, executive function, verbal memory, and composite score among RAS-AHM users.