Pharmacotherapy · 2017
Bridging with Tirofiban during Oral Antiplatelet Interruption: A Single-Center Case Series Analysis Including Patients on Hemodialysis.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Walker Elizabeth A, Dager William E
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Patients requiring an interruption in dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) within 6 months of cardiac stenting are at risk for thrombotic events. Bridging with short-acting intravenous antiplatelet agents has been proposed to minimize the risk of thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications.
METHODS: This retrospective analysis of a tirofiban bridging strategy did not use an initial bolus loading dose. Tirofiban infusions were initiated 24-48 hours after the last oral antiplatelet dose at a rate of 0.1 μg/kg/min (or 0.05 μg/kg/min if renal dysfunction) and continued until 4-8 hours before surgery or until DAPT could be resumed. Coprimary end points were occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and bleeding.
RESULTS: Twenty patients requiring DAPT interruption within 6 months of cardiac stenting for either a surgical procedure or who were unable to take any medications by mouth were included. The median time from stent implantation to DAPT interruption was 33 days (range 3-146 days). Two patients experienced a MACE during their hospital stay. No major bleeding events occurred; minor bleeding occurred in four patients during tirofiban therapy. Five patients in this analysis had end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis. Of these patients, no MACE or major bleeding events occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis observed that a tirofiban bridging strategy without an initial bolus loading dose has comparable efficacy and safety as previously published reports. A tirofiban infusion without bolus dosing may be a safe option for antiplatelet bridging in patients with a recent cardiac stent implant to prevent stent thrombosis.
METHODS: This retrospective analysis of a tirofiban bridging strategy did not use an initial bolus loading dose. Tirofiban infusions were initiated 24-48 hours after the last oral antiplatelet dose at a rate of 0.1 μg/kg/min (or 0.05 μg/kg/min if renal dysfunction) and continued until 4-8 hours before surgery or until DAPT could be resumed. Coprimary end points were occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and bleeding.
RESULTS: Twenty patients requiring DAPT interruption within 6 months of cardiac stenting for either a surgical procedure or who were unable to take any medications by mouth were included. The median time from stent implantation to DAPT interruption was 33 days (range 3-146 days). Two patients experienced a MACE during their hospital stay. No major bleeding events occurred; minor bleeding occurred in four patients during tirofiban therapy. Five patients in this analysis had end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis. Of these patients, no MACE or major bleeding events occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis observed that a tirofiban bridging strategy without an initial bolus loading dose has comparable efficacy and safety as previously published reports. A tirofiban infusion without bolus dosing may be a safe option for antiplatelet bridging in patients with a recent cardiac stent implant to prevent stent thrombosis.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Administration, OralAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCoronary Artery DiseaseDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousIntraoperative CareKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPostoperative HemorrhageRenal DialysisRetrospective StudiesStentsTirofibanTreatment OutcomeTyrosine