Clinical genitourinary cancer · 2023
Adverse Events of Cabozantinib Plus Nivolumab Versus Ipilimumab Plus Nivolumab.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Blas Leandro, Shiota Masaki, Tsukahara Shigehiro, Nagakawa Shohei, Matsumoto Takashi, Eto Masatoshi
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Recently, many agents and combinations for metastatic and advanced renal cell carcinoma have been approved. This study aims to highlight the comprehensive differences in adverse events (AEs) between cabozantinib (CAB) plus nivolumab (NIVO) and ipilimumab (IPI) plus NIVO based on a real-world big dataset.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We downloaded AE datasets of IPI + NIVO and CAB + NIVO from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database. We used the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities to treat each AE as a preferred term and grouped it into the System Organ Class (SOC). We performed logistic regression analyses to compare IPI + NIVO and CAB + NIVO.
RESULTS: The incidence rates of 7 types of toxicities were higher for CAB + NIVO than for IPI + NIVO. On the other hand, the incidence rates of 3 types of toxicities were higher for IPI + NIVO than for CAB + NIVO. Serious AEs were higher in patients receiving IPI + NIVO.
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that both combination therapies presented a disproportionate distribution of toxicities in several SOC. These findings may help clinicians select suitable therapy for the individual and improve the safety profile in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving NIVO + IPI and NIVO + CAB in a real-world setting.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We downloaded AE datasets of IPI + NIVO and CAB + NIVO from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database. We used the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities to treat each AE as a preferred term and grouped it into the System Organ Class (SOC). We performed logistic regression analyses to compare IPI + NIVO and CAB + NIVO.
RESULTS: The incidence rates of 7 types of toxicities were higher for CAB + NIVO than for IPI + NIVO. On the other hand, the incidence rates of 3 types of toxicities were higher for IPI + NIVO than for CAB + NIVO. Serious AEs were higher in patients receiving IPI + NIVO.
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that both combination therapies presented a disproportionate distribution of toxicities in several SOC. These findings may help clinicians select suitable therapy for the individual and improve the safety profile in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving NIVO + IPI and NIVO + CAB in a real-world setting.