Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2025
Examining the joint association of parental education and childhood adversities on gestational diabetes risk: A nationwide register study from Denmark.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Onizuka Hiroaki, Rod Naja H, Kragelund Nielsen Karoline, Damm Peter, Davies Megan
Аннотация
AIMS: Low parental education during childhood may increase vulnerability to childhood adversities, which is known to increase the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). We aimed to examine the joint association of parental education and childhood adversity on GDM risk.
METHODS: We used Danish nationwide register data of 206,819 women giving birth for the first time during 2004-2018. Five adversity groups were used to measure childhood adversity: low adversity, early material deprivation, persistent deprivation, loss or threat of loss, and high adversity. We examined the joint association of parental education and childhood adversity on GDM risk through interaction at the multiplicative and additive scale, using three levels of parental education: low, medium and high education, with high education and low adversity as the referent group.
RESULTS: 4758 (2.3%) women were diagnosed with GDM in the study population. We found a significant joint association of parental education and childhood adversity on GDM risk. Women with a low parental education level and who experienced loss or threat of loss had a higher risk of GDM compared to women with a high parental education level and low childhood adversity (OR 2.60 [95% CI 2.15; 3.12]). The additive scale showed some additivity though did not reach statistical significance, and there was no evidence of interaction on the multiplicative scale.
CONCLUSIONS: Having both exposure to low parental education and childhood adversity may further increase the risk of GDM. Structural interventions aimed at providing better support and resources for low socioeconomic status families may reduce the risk of GDM.
METHODS: We used Danish nationwide register data of 206,819 women giving birth for the first time during 2004-2018. Five adversity groups were used to measure childhood adversity: low adversity, early material deprivation, persistent deprivation, loss or threat of loss, and high adversity. We examined the joint association of parental education and childhood adversity on GDM risk through interaction at the multiplicative and additive scale, using three levels of parental education: low, medium and high education, with high education and low adversity as the referent group.
RESULTS: 4758 (2.3%) women were diagnosed with GDM in the study population. We found a significant joint association of parental education and childhood adversity on GDM risk. Women with a low parental education level and who experienced loss or threat of loss had a higher risk of GDM compared to women with a high parental education level and low childhood adversity (OR 2.60 [95% CI 2.15; 3.12]). The additive scale showed some additivity though did not reach statistical significance, and there was no evidence of interaction on the multiplicative scale.
CONCLUSIONS: Having both exposure to low parental education and childhood adversity may further increase the risk of GDM. Structural interventions aimed at providing better support and resources for low socioeconomic status families may reduce the risk of GDM.