European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery · 2015
Indocyanine Green Lymphography Findings in Primary Leg Lymphedema.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yamamoto T, Yoshimatsu H, Narushima M, Yamamoto N, Hayashi A, Koshima I
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography has been reported to be useful for the evaluation of secondary lymphedema, but no study has reported characteristic findings of ICG lymphography in primary lymphedema. This study aimed to classify characteristic ICG lymphography patterns in primary lymphedema.
METHODS: The study was a retrospective observational study. Thirty one primary lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) patients with a total of 62 legs were studied. ICG lymphography patterns were categorized according to the visibility of lymphatics and dermal backflow (DB) extension. Clinical demographics were compared with categorized ICG lymphography patterns.
RESULTS: All symptomatic legs showed abnormal patterns, and all asymptomatic legs showed normal patterns on ICG lymphography. Abnormal lymphographic patterns could be classified into proximal DB (PDB), distal DB (DDB), less enhancement (LE), and no enhancement (NE) patterns. There were significant differences between PDB (16 patients), DDB (6 patients), LE (4 patients), and NE patterns (5 patients) in age (37.3 ± 18.3 vs. 61.8 ± 19.2 vs. 50.8 ± 27.7 vs. 29.2 ± 18.0 years, p = .035), onset of edema (23.9 ± 19.4 vs. 46.8 ± 27.0 vs. 43.0 ± 31.3 vs. 6.6 ± 14.2 years, p = .020), laterality (bilateral; 18.8% vs. 66.7% vs. 75.0% vs. 0%, p ¼ .016), cellulitis history(56.3% vs. 100% vs. 25.0% vs. 0%, p ¼ .007), and LEL index (292.2 ± 32.8 vs. 254.2 ± 28.6 vs. 243.3 ± 9.4 vs. 295.2 ± 44.8, p = .016).
CONCLUSIONS: ICG lymphography findings in primary lymphedema could be classified into four patterns withdifferent patient characteristics.
METHODS: The study was a retrospective observational study. Thirty one primary lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) patients with a total of 62 legs were studied. ICG lymphography patterns were categorized according to the visibility of lymphatics and dermal backflow (DB) extension. Clinical demographics were compared with categorized ICG lymphography patterns.
RESULTS: All symptomatic legs showed abnormal patterns, and all asymptomatic legs showed normal patterns on ICG lymphography. Abnormal lymphographic patterns could be classified into proximal DB (PDB), distal DB (DDB), less enhancement (LE), and no enhancement (NE) patterns. There were significant differences between PDB (16 patients), DDB (6 patients), LE (4 patients), and NE patterns (5 patients) in age (37.3 ± 18.3 vs. 61.8 ± 19.2 vs. 50.8 ± 27.7 vs. 29.2 ± 18.0 years, p = .035), onset of edema (23.9 ± 19.4 vs. 46.8 ± 27.0 vs. 43.0 ± 31.3 vs. 6.6 ± 14.2 years, p = .020), laterality (bilateral; 18.8% vs. 66.7% vs. 75.0% vs. 0%, p ¼ .016), cellulitis history(56.3% vs. 100% vs. 25.0% vs. 0%, p ¼ .007), and LEL index (292.2 ± 32.8 vs. 254.2 ± 28.6 vs. 243.3 ± 9.4 vs. 295.2 ± 44.8, p = .016).
CONCLUSIONS: ICG lymphography findings in primary lymphedema could be classified into four patterns withdifferent patient characteristics.