Uncovering knowledge of pediatric sepsis and recognition of septic shock: a survey among Brazilian pediatricians.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the ability of Brazilian pediatricians to recognize sepsis and septic shock in children.

METHODS

A cross-sectional multicenter survey was conducted among Brazilian pediatricians between May and June 2023, before the release of the new Phoenix sepsis criteria in 2024. An online electronic system was used for surveys to characterize the knowledge and skills of physicians in the diagnosis and treatment of sepsis in children. The questions related to the diagnosis and treatment of sepsis and septic shock in children were based on the International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference, the American College of Critical Care Medicine Guidelines, and the Surviving Sepsis Campaign in Pediatrics. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed using R software.

RESULTS

Pediatricians were surveyed about the recognition, knowledge, and management of pediatric patients with sepsis and septic shock. The responses of 355 physicians from all regions of Brazil were analyzed, with the majority from the southeastern region of the country (53.3%). In clinical practice, the most utilized criteria for diagnosing sepsis included inappropriate tachycardia (92%), temperature alteration (88.2%), and the presence of a suspected or confirmed infectious focus (87.9%). For septic shock, capillary refill time alteration (87.1%), arterial hypotension (84.8%), and changes in the level of consciousness (82.2%) were the predominant indicators. A total of 55.6% pediatricians reported having the potential to obtain venous or intraosseous access within 5 minutes, and 59.3% could administer antibiotics within the first hour. Approximately one-quarter (27.5%) of the participants responded that it was possible to infuse 40 - 60mL/kg in 1 hour. The most commonly used solution for fluid resuscitation was isotonic saline (70.9%), followed by Ringer's lactate (45.0%). The infusion of a vasopressor was considered in patients who did not improve after receiving an infusion of 40 - 60mL/kg (75.8%).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to assess the knowledge of sepsis and septic shock among the Brazilian pediatric population. The results reveal a significant deficiency in the recognition of sepsis. This study demonstrated a gap between evidence and clinical practice. Adherence to international guidelines needs to be improved.