MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/ons/opx186

Медицинская библиотека · Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.) · 2018

BrainPath-Mediated Resection of a Ruptured Subcortical Arteriovenous Malformation.

Witek Alex M, Moore Nina Z, Sebai M Adeeb, Bain Mark D

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Although tubular retractor systems have gained popularity for other indications, there have been few reports of their use for arteriovenous malformation (AVM) surgery. A patient was diagnosed with a ruptured 1.2-cm subcortical AVM after presenting with intracerebral hemorrhage in the right frontal lobe and anterior basal ganglia. The characteristics of this AVM made it amenable to resection using a tubular retractor.

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the feasibility and safety of AVM resection using a tubular retractor system.

METHODS

Resection of the ruptured 1.2-cm subcortical AVM was performed utilizing the BrainPathTM (NICO corp, Indianapolis, Indiana) tubular retractor system.

RESULTS

The BrainPathTM approach provided sufficient visualization and surgical freedom to permit successful AVM resection and hematoma evacuation. Postoperative imaging demonstrated near total hematoma removal and angiographic obliteration of the AVM. There were no complications, and the patient made an excellent recovery.

CONCLUSION

Tubular retractors warrant consideration for accessing small, deep, ruptured AVMs. The nuances of such systems and their role in AVM surgery are discussed.

Для цитирования: Witek Alex M, Moore Nina Z, Sebai M Adeeb, Bain Mark D. BrainPath-Mediated Resection of a Ruptured Subcortical Arteriovenous Malformation.. Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.). 2018. DOI: 10.1093/ons/opx186.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.