Orthodontics & craniofacial research · 2012
Facial asymmetry index in normal young adults.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Huang C S, Liu X Q, Chen Y R
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To differentiate a symmetric face from an asymmetric face by analyzing a three-dimensional (3D) facial image and plotting the asymmetry index (AI) on a facial symmetry diagram.
SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Sixty healthy Chinese adults (30 men and 30 women, mean age: 27.7 + 4.9 years old) without any craniofacial deformity were recruited on a voluntary basis from a medical center.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A 3D facial image of each participant was captured by a GENEX 3D FACE CAM system. Sixteen facial landmarks, as defined by Farkas, were selected on each 3D facial image. The AI was calculated for each landmark.
RESULTS: The norm for the AI varied from 0.76 to 2.82. The landmarks located on the upper face had a smaller AI than the landmarks located on the lower face. A facial symmetry diagram was designed according to the mean, one standard deviation, and 2 standard deviations of AI for each landmark.
CONCLUSIONS: The 3D facial asymmetry can be documented with AI. The landmarks located on the upper face had a smaller AI than the landmarks located on the lower face. The facial symmetry diagram can identify efficiently the location of asymmetry on a face.
SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Sixty healthy Chinese adults (30 men and 30 women, mean age: 27.7 + 4.9 years old) without any craniofacial deformity were recruited on a voluntary basis from a medical center.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A 3D facial image of each participant was captured by a GENEX 3D FACE CAM system. Sixteen facial landmarks, as defined by Farkas, were selected on each 3D facial image. The AI was calculated for each landmark.
RESULTS: The norm for the AI varied from 0.76 to 2.82. The landmarks located on the upper face had a smaller AI than the landmarks located on the lower face. A facial symmetry diagram was designed according to the mean, one standard deviation, and 2 standard deviations of AI for each landmark.
CONCLUSIONS: The 3D facial asymmetry can be documented with AI. The landmarks located on the upper face had a smaller AI than the landmarks located on the lower face. The facial symmetry diagram can identify efficiently the location of asymmetry on a face.