Journal of pediatric surgery · 2013
Single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease: a comparison of short-term surgical results.
Сравнительное исследованиеКонтролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tang Shao-Tao, Yang Ying, Li Shi-Wang, Cao Guo-Qing, Yang Li, Huang Xin, Shuai Li, Wang Guo-Bin
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Single-incision laparoscopy has recently become a popular procedure in pediatric surgery. The current series is the largest study to evaluate the operative complications and results of single-incision laparoscopic endorectal pull-through (SILEP) for the treatment of HD through a retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopic endorectal pull-through (CLEP).
METHODS: Twenty eight patients who underwent single-incision laparoscopic endorectal pull-through for HD between July 2010 and August 2011 were compared to thirty patients who underwent CLEP. Patient age, gender, transitional zone, operative time, blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative complications, as well as short-term results, were assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 28 patients were included for SILEP, and historical reported 30 patients were completed by CLEP. The SILEP and CLEP groups were similar in regard to age, gender, transition zone, operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, and intraoperative complications. Postoperative results were not different, including equal daily defecation frequency and early postoperative complications. No patients with recurrent constipation were seen. Two patients with the transitional zone in the descending colon in the SILEP group had a 3mm trocar added in the left abdomen, and there were no conversions in the conventional laparoscopic group.
CONCLUSION: We have shown that in selected HD patients, the SILEP technique was safe and technically feasible in experienced hands. It results in similar operative results compared with conventional laparoscopic endorectal pull-through. However, the operation is more difficult if the transition zone was higher than the rectosigmoid.
METHODS: Twenty eight patients who underwent single-incision laparoscopic endorectal pull-through for HD between July 2010 and August 2011 were compared to thirty patients who underwent CLEP. Patient age, gender, transitional zone, operative time, blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative complications, as well as short-term results, were assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 28 patients were included for SILEP, and historical reported 30 patients were completed by CLEP. The SILEP and CLEP groups were similar in regard to age, gender, transition zone, operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, and intraoperative complications. Postoperative results were not different, including equal daily defecation frequency and early postoperative complications. No patients with recurrent constipation were seen. Two patients with the transitional zone in the descending colon in the SILEP group had a 3mm trocar added in the left abdomen, and there were no conversions in the conventional laparoscopic group.
CONCLUSION: We have shown that in selected HD patients, the SILEP technique was safe and technically feasible in experienced hands. It results in similar operative results compared with conventional laparoscopic endorectal pull-through. However, the operation is more difficult if the transition zone was higher than the rectosigmoid.