Neurology · 2020
Familial language network vulnerability in primary progressive aphasia.
Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Weintraub Sandra, Rader Benjamin, Coventry Christina, Sridhar Jaiashre, Wood Jessica, Guillaume Kyla A, Coppola Giovanni, Ramos Eliana Marisa, Bonakdarpour Borna, Rogalski Emily J, Mesulam M Marsel
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To investigate evidence of the potential role of early cortical vulnerability in the development of primary progressive aphasia (PPA).
METHOD: A woman with a diagnosis of PPA and her 9 adult siblings, 7 with developmental language disabilities, underwent neuropsychological testing, structural MRI, and resting-state fMRI. Whole-exome sequencing was conducted for genes associated with dyslexia or with neurodegenerative dementia.
RESULTS: The siblings demonstrated lower verbal than nonverbal cognitive test scores in a developmental dyslexia pattern. On structural MRI, although the siblings did not differ from controls in total brain volume, the left hemisphere language area volume was significantly smaller than the right. Furthermore, cortical connectivity between the left superior temporal area, previously identified as the region of peak atrophy in the proband early in the course of illness, and adjacent language network components, including the planum temporale, was decreased in the siblings. No distinctive genetic signatures were identified.
CONCLUSION: This report further supports the hypothesis that at least some cases of PPA may be based on a familial language network vulnerability that interferes with the acquisition of language in some members and that makes the language network a locus of least resistance to the effects of an independently late-arising neurodegenerative disease in others. This association offers a conceptual model to explain why identical neurodegenerative diseases may selectively target the language network in some individuals while targeting networks that regulate memory or behavior in others. The genetic basis for this vulnerability remains to be determined.
METHOD: A woman with a diagnosis of PPA and her 9 adult siblings, 7 with developmental language disabilities, underwent neuropsychological testing, structural MRI, and resting-state fMRI. Whole-exome sequencing was conducted for genes associated with dyslexia or with neurodegenerative dementia.
RESULTS: The siblings demonstrated lower verbal than nonverbal cognitive test scores in a developmental dyslexia pattern. On structural MRI, although the siblings did not differ from controls in total brain volume, the left hemisphere language area volume was significantly smaller than the right. Furthermore, cortical connectivity between the left superior temporal area, previously identified as the region of peak atrophy in the proband early in the course of illness, and adjacent language network components, including the planum temporale, was decreased in the siblings. No distinctive genetic signatures were identified.
CONCLUSION: This report further supports the hypothesis that at least some cases of PPA may be based on a familial language network vulnerability that interferes with the acquisition of language in some members and that makes the language network a locus of least resistance to the effects of an independently late-arising neurodegenerative disease in others. This association offers a conceptual model to explain why identical neurodegenerative diseases may selectively target the language network in some individuals while targeting networks that regulate memory or behavior in others. The genetic basis for this vulnerability remains to be determined.