Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2024
The Impact of Age in Patients Undergoing Impella-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bimal Tia, Fishbein Joanna, Gandotra Puneet, Meraj Perwaiz M, Lee Alexander, Kim Michael C, Omar Wally, Ong Lawrence, Gruberg Luis
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Short-term percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices provide hemodynamic support in cardiogenic shock or during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
AIMS: To assess the impact of age on the clinical and angiographic characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of all patients undergoing PCI with the Impella MCS.
METHODS: Data on all patients that underwent PCI with an Impella was divided into three groups according to age: < 65, 65 to < 75 years, and ≥ 75 years. In-hospital mortality, stroke, and major bleeding complications were assessed.
RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2018, 245 patients underwent PCI with Impella support. Almost half of all patients were < 65 years old and 32% were ≥ 75 year old. Clinical characteristics varied significantly among the three groups. Almost half of younger patients were in the midst of an ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) compared with 9% of patients ≥ 75 years (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, 57% of younger patients were in cardiogenic shock, compared with 21% of those ≥ 75 years (p = 0.002). In-hospital mortality was highest in the 65 to < 75 years group (17%) compared with 9% and 10% in the < 65 and ≥ 75-year-olds groups, respectively. Major bleeding complications were not significantly different among the three age groups. Multivariable analysis for in-hospital mortality showed that STEMI on presentation and ages 65 to < 75 years compared to those < 65 years were associated with an increased odds of in-hospital death.
CONCLUSION: Clinical characteristics and indications for Impella MCS use in patients undergoing PCI varied significantly according to age. However, in-hospital outcomes were not significantly different among the three groups.
AIMS: To assess the impact of age on the clinical and angiographic characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of all patients undergoing PCI with the Impella MCS.
METHODS: Data on all patients that underwent PCI with an Impella was divided into three groups according to age: < 65, 65 to < 75 years, and ≥ 75 years. In-hospital mortality, stroke, and major bleeding complications were assessed.
RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2018, 245 patients underwent PCI with Impella support. Almost half of all patients were < 65 years old and 32% were ≥ 75 year old. Clinical characteristics varied significantly among the three groups. Almost half of younger patients were in the midst of an ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) compared with 9% of patients ≥ 75 years (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, 57% of younger patients were in cardiogenic shock, compared with 21% of those ≥ 75 years (p = 0.002). In-hospital mortality was highest in the 65 to < 75 years group (17%) compared with 9% and 10% in the < 65 and ≥ 75-year-olds groups, respectively. Major bleeding complications were not significantly different among the three age groups. Multivariable analysis for in-hospital mortality showed that STEMI on presentation and ages 65 to < 75 years compared to those < 65 years were associated with an increased odds of in-hospital death.
CONCLUSION: Clinical characteristics and indications for Impella MCS use in patients undergoing PCI varied significantly according to age. However, in-hospital outcomes were not significantly different among the three groups.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
HumansAgedHeart-Assist DevicesMaleFemalePercutaneous Coronary InterventionAge FactorsShock, CardiogenicHospital MortalityTreatment OutcomeRisk FactorsMiddle AgedTime FactorsRisk AssessmentRetrospective StudiesAged, 80 and overHemorrhageCoronary Artery DiseaseST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionHemodynamics