Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2010
Selective-site pacing in paediatric patients: use of the SelectSecure System and risk of vein occlusion.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gabbarini Fulvio, Agnoletti Gabriella
Аннотация
AIMS: Few data are available about selective-site pacing in children. A 4.1 Fr lead is now available: it has to be introduced through an 8.4 Fr steerable catheter, and it raises concerns as to the long-term patency of the subclavian vein. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the patency of the subclavian vein in children who had selective-site pacing by the SelectSecure Lead System (SSLS) for atrioventricular block and look for possible local early and late complications.
METHODS AND RESULTS: From June 2006 to January 2010, we implanted 20 patients. Mean age at implantation was 9 years (range 3-16), mean weight 31 kg (range 13-57). All patients received a dual-chamber pacemaker (PM). The patency of the subclavian vein was evaluated by ultrasound 1, 3, and every 6 months after the PM implantation. We also looked for oedema, swelling, changes in temperature or colour of the skin, and visible superficial circulation. Forty leads were implanted in 20 patients. After a median follow-up of 19 months (range 6-44), no clinical signs or symptoms of vein occlusion were detected in the whole population. None of the patients had an alteration of blood flow at Doppler examination.
CONCLUSION: The SSLS is a promising and safe system for permanent intracardiac pacing in paediatric patients. We show that it does not increase the risk of venous thrombosis. Until a venography study with a larger population and longer follow-up regarding venous patency and overall complications using SSLS will be performed, our results although promising have to be considered preliminary data.
METHODS AND RESULTS: From June 2006 to January 2010, we implanted 20 patients. Mean age at implantation was 9 years (range 3-16), mean weight 31 kg (range 13-57). All patients received a dual-chamber pacemaker (PM). The patency of the subclavian vein was evaluated by ultrasound 1, 3, and every 6 months after the PM implantation. We also looked for oedema, swelling, changes in temperature or colour of the skin, and visible superficial circulation. Forty leads were implanted in 20 patients. After a median follow-up of 19 months (range 6-44), no clinical signs or symptoms of vein occlusion were detected in the whole population. None of the patients had an alteration of blood flow at Doppler examination.
CONCLUSION: The SSLS is a promising and safe system for permanent intracardiac pacing in paediatric patients. We show that it does not increase the risk of venous thrombosis. Until a venography study with a larger population and longer follow-up regarding venous patency and overall complications using SSLS will be performed, our results although promising have to be considered preliminary data.